Reflections on another year, as we approach 50…

Reflections on another year, as we approach 50…
Dr David KL Quek

“…This labour, by slow prudence to make mild

A rugged people, and thro' soft degrees

Subdue them to the useful and the good…

…The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices. Come, my friends,

'T is not too late to seek a newer world…”

~Alfred Lord Tennyson, Ulysses (1809-1892)

The year has flown by, quite literally. Having just taken on the mantle in June last year, I must admit that it has been a breathless rollercoaster experience.

Perhaps what now rankles me somewhat upon reflection is that I wasn’t able to do many of the things that I had envisaged, planned or even hoped. I know I began my term of office by outlining an ambitious plethora of ideas, which now seem almost impossible to fully accomplish, at least not yet.

But I believe, we did manage to at least embark on almost every one of these issues, even if the solutions are unfinished. At the very least, there is that one more year to consolidate on our gains, and to put in place, what we had begun with tentative steps. Clearly too, there is so much work left to do and to continue to proceed collectively.

Still, the flurry of activities and circumstances, which has unfolded have kept my term thus far quite preoccupied. It is clear now that some of these can’t really be predicted, and are more or less foisted upon us by happenstance rather than by foreseeable plans. I suppose having to act and react rapidly and yet judiciously, have defined to some degree what the current mood of the MMA has been under the current Council and my concept of leadership.

So what have we achieved this 11 months or so? I will discuss just some major points of impact for this issue.

Engagement with the MOH, sometimes discordant…

Perhaps one of the more important actions that I have taken is to personally engage more openly and consistently with the Ministry of Health and its officials. We have been participating in many dialogues and planning committees to resolve a myriad of issues. It is not that we have not been meeting them before.

Indeed, many of our predecessors, past presidents and executive committee members had met with MOH officials countless times before, and many issues had been discussed, and some tentative agreements made. But somehow many of the issues and concerns almost always appear remote then but far more urgent now than previously, perhaps because many of these are now coming to a boil, e.g. the 10th Malaysia plan and the proposed healthcare restructuring plans.

Of course we did not always see eye to eye with the Minister or the Director-General on all issues, but through our constant input we have managed to robustly present our viewpoints and our misgivings more directly. Perhaps seen in the cold light of the present, these issues appear more serious and their implications so much more pressing and current.

The 1Malaysia Clinics being manned by paramedical staff remain our major point of disagreement, which we feel undermines specifically the private GPs’ position, but generally the role and position of doctors nationwide, vis-à-vis primary healthcare services. We understand the political and social need to have more accessible clinics for the urban poor, but we disagree that this is the best possible way forward. We still believe unreservedly that doctors should be brought into the picture. Perhaps, the many urban located GPs should have been involved in this exercise to enhance primary healthcare services for these less endowed people.

We hope that with the greater number of medical graduates now available in the MOH, the authorities can deploy fully-qualified medical officers to cover all such clinics including the klinik kesihatan’s throughout the country, urban or rural, in the near future. Some of our GPs now having registered with the MOH should also help to lessen the purported shortage in some of these public clinics throughout the country, and contribute to society in just these critical areas.

We recognise that policy directions and decisions are often so theoretically biased or conceptually incomplete, that some of the more pertinent and practical aspects can become lost in the actual translation. These became points of contention when we were trying to present a concerted approach to containing and modulating the A/H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Communication Barriers remain

Communication down to the grassroots public or even our healthcare providers/officers proved to be disjointed and incomplete no matter the best intentions and the purported use of the mass media. So too were the injunctions to be more vigilant about the resurgent dengue epidemic, which continue to inflict some troublesome and mounting death statistics!

There are still pretty big gaps in our communication access with our members, our doctors out there. Our monthly Berita MMA is clearly too slow, as a medium to transmit urgent messages to our members, especially when events evolve at sometimes breakneck speed! However, this remains the best chronicle for our members. We have to find a better mechanism to reach out to all our doctors and members more consistently, so that all of us can be on the same page, so to speak.

Unfortunately too, our MMA website is still not up to par and is not a favoured regular site of access for most of our members… We are making improvements through a grant from MIDA, but the actual rollout would take some time to meander through its teething problems. For that matter, our MOH website is also not a guaranteed hit for the public or the doctors to access at will!

Would it be possible to utilize tweets or twitter to reach out to our members in due course? Perhaps we could explore this soon, but getting every member to register with us is proving difficult if not impossible, even as we encourage emails at the present time.

With regards to the mainstream media however, it is clear that we are not that newsworthy iconic association that the mass media finds interests in, consistently. The conventional mass media has been less accommodating than we had hoped—they have been piecemeal in reporting on our press releases, opinions or even rebuttals, and therefore have made our tasks so much harder.

Worse, the mass media has a predilection for exaggeration and slanting our viewpoints this way and that, to suit their own agendas, or to sensationalise their own bias, and sometimes even to provoke the authorities, with the MMA being used as a convenient punching bag!

I have tried to resolve this by creating a Facebook MyHealth Matters MMA 2009-2011 site for easier communication for all doctors wishing to log in, but to date the numbers registered remain small, just over 115 doctors and medical students, those actively contributing even fewer…

PHCFS Regulations/Fees—Amendments on the way…

Behind the scenes, we have had numerous (almost monthly this year) meetings with the Amalan (Practice) division of the MOH to modify and resolve the numerous less palatable articles and clauses of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act and Regulations.

We have resolved to remove the very severe punitive measures such as jail terms and excessive fines, and are offering in its stead compound fines for non-compliance of minor technical issues. We have also resolved to remove purely technical infringements from being labelled as egregious breaches of the regulations or law.

We are now embarking on refining the fees schedule, which has proven to be particularly contentious with third party payers and insurance companies. Although we have stated that we would prefer this schedule to be removed from the regulations, the Ministry has categorically rejected this suggestion.

Our 5th Schedule (tendered in since 2008) is unfortunately delayed due to concerns of costs inflation and disagreements with certain specialty societies, but we continue to urge that it be incorporated and updated soon, after some discrepancies have been ironed out. It is useful to remember that the latest schedule in the Regulations was based on our MMA rates first tabled in 2002! It is already 8 years old and the health insurance payer companies are still fighting to reduce and limit our fees! Greater detail in the itemizing of the schedule of fees would help remove misinterpretations and arguments as to the spirit of the fees chargeable by doctors. This aspect has been severely lacking in the adoption of our schedule into the current PHCFS Regulations.

Various Dialogues

Other important areas where we have been active in having important dialogues include our National Health Restructuring/Reform and Policy (1Care). We have had several discussions with officials from the MOH as well as various divisions of the EPU of the PM’s Department; trying to clarify uncertainties as well as grassroots concerns from a professional standpoint.

We have voiced our growing concern that a single-payer healthcare system although ideal is currently fraught with many obstacles, the chief of which is the funding mechanism, which has to be resolved with every stakeholder buying in. This means every citizen, including the healthcare professionals.

We had discussed widening the contribution base for every working citizen, and not just the taxpayers. Under the present circumstances, we foresee deficiencies that would not make feasible this national healthcare reform, what with the government cutting back on allocations and paradoxically expecting the private sector to raise their stakes.

Furthermore, when trying to implement the concept of primary healthcare-led initiatives, do we have the mechanisms for an integrated, portable and yet safe confidential health recording system and the appropriate sharing of health information, including reliable methods of disbursing funds?

We have also had discussions on the Healthcare Liberalisation plans now in place from 2010 (Mutual Recognition Agreements, ASEAN Free Trade agreements) where we managed to get some MIDA grants to enhance dissemination of this initiative.

MSQH: Deviated Approach (?) and GP Accreditation Woes

Perhaps one of the most worrisome plans that the MMA had to rein in the brakes and forestall this year, is the planned Accreditation programme for medical clinics, advocated by the Malaysian Society for Quality in Healthcare (MSQH).

Although this programme was supposed to be voluntary, exercises such as these have a ‘covert’ way of becoming “standards”. The MMA fears that this accreditation move could become institutional barriers to limit entry into schemes for involvement in employee benefit clinic panels, insurance buyers or even being considered part of our future integrated primary care system. As such, the MMA could not agree to be partners of such measures, which would shrink the autonomy of doctors, particularly those in private practice.

Although the MMA is an initial founding tripartite partner of this society (with the MOH and APHM); over the years since 1998, some of us in the MMA’s current leadership feel that MSQH has evolved into an unrecognizable entity, where our role has, to put it bluntly, been marginalized and our influence negated.

Part of this is our fault, the MMA then did not take this society too seriously, but then again we had failed to recognise the deviation from its original ideals and objectives. While we did have different representatives taking part in various subcommittees of the MSQH, the actual impact of some of the programmes discussed have not been fully addressed. As such, until perhaps this fiscal year, there have been tacit but less than informed approvals of what has been transpiring and planned.

Because of this, the MMA feels that the MSQH has deviated from its original aims. It is arguable how this society has become transformed into a corporate entity, where non-medical professionals have a larger say and sway than perhaps the MMA and the doctors who are on the receiving end.

If as is stated that we actually co-own this as a third partner, how is it that there are individual and corporate members, every one of which, carry equal weight and voting rights? Is this a public society and if so, how should its influence and powers really be vis-à-vis the authorities and the MOH? Is the MSQH now a for-profit body where individuals or corporate bodies can buy a stake for potential returns later?

What then is the actual role of the MMA if we are just to rubber stamp the legitimacy of being involved in the closed-door strategic planning and discussions, which could potentially constrain the medical profession even more? Aside from being just one of the many ‘dialogue partners’ and officers who actually work to fine tune the accreditation framework, what really is the gain from MMA’s involvement in the MSQH? There are clearly no financial returns thus far, despite our contribution of RM 100,000 towards the original seeding fund.

How will our members and doctors benefit? It is not enough to suggest that the MMA should serve as a professional guardian to upkeep and raise the standards of healthcare for the nation—these objectives can be met from different approaches, but not at the expense of our doctors. We already have the PHCFS Act and Regulations, do we need more?

The MMA believes the MSQH should be restructured to reflect the original honor system of its 3 main protagonists, with each having equal and executive say; otherwise, it is pointless to continue. Having a designated vice-president position for namesake only is totally inadequate, and reeks of seat-warming representation.

Are we ultimately in the guise of furthering standards in healthcare practices, pushing for greater micromanagement scrutiny and checks for our healthcare provider? Would this additional burden on the clinics enhance our care or simply corrode our practices even more, especially when there is no incentive or return of investments for some of these so-called clinic enhancement measures? Are we enriching some independent entity in a manner that is not altogether clear to us at present? Many questions remain to be asked.

Therefore, it is perhaps time to reappraise our relationship with the MSQH, because it is difficult to fully support its objectives as it now stands, or the direction where it is heading. Together with other medical professional groups such as Academy of Family Physicians, PCDOM, FPMPAM, etc. we are extremely concerned and uneasy about its potential reach and policies. We will need to reconcile and relook into this relationship very soon.

50th Anniversary & our Caring Physician Ethos

As we ponder on the 50th Anniversary of our national MMA, many challenges continue to emerge, which will test the mettle of the medical profession. As outlined above, we face a host of problems concerning professional practice with: the PHCFS Act and Regulations; 1Malaysia clinics; GP uncertainties; mounting insurance and third party payer queries; accreditation plans (MSQH) for GP clinics; better MOH perks, wages and benefits for our public sector doctors; but worries of too many medical graduates and their possibly inadequate training and standards, have recently raised quite a few eyebrows; etc.

Therefore, as medical professionals we must endeavour to remain relevant and professional as we become more effective and efficient. We must also interact with our more discerning and empowered patients in a better, kinder and a more caring approach to enhance each and every patient-doctor encounter. Public expectations certainly demand this paradigm shift toward a more caring and empathetic relationship. The days of the aloof, patrician, paternalistic doctor-knows-best style, are passé.

For most of these critical issues, we need to engage the authorities to help find workable solutions, which will enhance rather than ultimately cripple our healthcare system or make our medical practices unbearable and demotivating.

Greater Physician Involvement: Leadership Needed

But we also need physician leadership to continually take up the challenge of inputting practical on-the-ground misgivings/problems so as to help modulate the theoretical constructs of overview-type changes, which the MOH has deemed necessary to bring about.

I know I have said so many times before, and I wish to repeat this again: we need more doctors to come forwards, to become more involved, be more participatory and engaged to help move our health system forward in a modernisation exercise which would lead to first world standards and universal access to healthcare for all our Malaysian residents and citizens.

We cannot simply remain within our comfort zones, and hope that reforms and changes would simply wash over us. This will not do, because, the impacts will be greater and could even be life changing. Our livelihoods are at stake! Doctors must be willing to come forwards to protect our own professional interests, while we help look after that of our patients. We cannot abdicate this role to others!

This is not to say that we gratuitously disagree or oppose the many important reforms that the government and the MOH are trying to implement. In fact we laud the MOH for its continuous efforts to improve the standards of healthcare and their unapologetic patient safety concerns. Indeed, we are always ready to fully support these reforms for the betterment of our healthcare system, but we do need to be partners of this ongoing dialogue.

Why is this important?

Because, doctors within the MMA whether we like it or not, are the most vocal and arguably the largest representative body of healthcare providers who are best placed to help recognise inconsistencies and glitches in national policy programmes and directions.

Because, I believe that many of us are concerned public advocates (despite our ingrained vested professional interests), who can stand apart and give the better, disinterested input. We are not simply yeah-sayers. We are at the forefront of our healthcare concern and are better placed in many ways to help resolve conflicting and teething problems of real-life practice, not always foreseen by regulators and policy makers—e.g. the potential glut of medical colleges and graduates is one serious point in question.

As medical professionals, we must learn to be more interested, more participatory, to work together as a team in creating more awareness about healthcare issues. We must actively encourage the Malaysian public to get more involved in its own healthcare. We must also engage more robustly with the authorities to help realize a better healthcare system for Malaysia. We cannot afford to become fragmented and weak, so that our voice becomes muted and inconsequential.

We must encourage greater public discourse and debate about our future healthcare plans, funding and reforms; and how these would potentially impact on the public and even on us as medical professionals.

As we enter into our Golden Jubilee, the MMA must become more relevant and consequential! There is much to do, so little time, but together I believe, we can make a better difference for our Malaysian healthcare.

Nutgraph Version: A(H1N1): Still under control

A(H1N1): Still under control

21 Aug 09 : 5.55PM

By Dr David KL Quek
editor@thenutgraph.com

WHAT are the current and potential problems doctors might be facing in combating the spread of the swine flu?

It would be good if every doctor kept a constant and close tab on the H1N1 pandemic, and remained fully aware of the developments and changes, which are evolving daily. Logging on to the internet regularly for more updated information would certainly help.

(Pic by Barky / sxc.hu)

Every doctor has to be more proactive and practise more responsible and cautious medical professionalism during this trying period, which is expected to go on for one to two years. Importantly, they must assiduously look out for lung complications, quickly identify high-risk profiles, and refer these patients promptly for further specialised care.

Easier access to antiviral drugs and responsible use and monitoring would help allay public fears of delayed treatment, but this should be with care. There is genuine fear that the precious antiviral drug might be used indiscriminately for prevention; this could inadvertently create the worse outcome of drug-resistant bugs.

However, in light of the very quick deterioration and death of some young patients, it might be prudent to use antiviral treatment earlier and more aggressively.

We look forward to the specific H1N1 vaccine when it does come our way, probably towards the end of the year. In the meantime, encouraging those in the front line, heart or lung patients, and frequent travellers to have the seasonal flu vaccination is a useful adjunct to help stem the usual problems from other flu types

We are facing some problems with health insurance companies. This is especially the case in private hospitals, where many insurance companies are refusing to reimburse for the treatment because it appears that pandemic illness is excluded from the contract for medical insurance. Hence, it is good that Etiqa health insurance has come forward to state publicly that the H1N1 flu is a reimbursable illness.

Is the government's current logistics capable of handling this outbreak, or a second or third wave of the flu as predicted?

It is difficult to say at this time. We certainly hope that this second or third wave will not take place. It is almost a certainty that the community spread of the A(H1N1) flu in Malaysia will escalate, and more and more Malaysians will come down with this flu.

However, the MMA wishes to reiterate that most of these infections would be quite mild and require only symptomatic treatment, bedrest and close watch at home. Only a minority (perhaps 2% to 5%) may require hospital care or more.

If these very severe complications occur in a staggered manner, then we can cope with the problem. But if a huge unprecedented outbreak of very severe complications takes place, this can easily overwhelm the system. That said, contingency plans of equipping general wards with intensive care capacities, or even field hospitals, have been made.

There are also structured plans to increase the country's intensive care bed capacity to at least twice the number available now (which is around 300 beds only). However, training sufficient staff and specialists to provide such care may require more time and expert guidance.

Should all doctors advise their patients to self-quarantine if they display symptoms?

Yes, this is the message that we have been advocating: it is best for all doctors to advise their patients to self-quarantine if they display flu-like symptoms. This is the first and most basic step in curbing the spread of the disease.

Would the MMA describe the current A(H1N1) pandemic as "out of control"?

At this juncture, the MMA does not believe that the situation is out of control and that we need any health curfew. The health minister yesterday announced that the government would only consider declaring a health curfew if the mortality rate due to influenza A(H1N1) outbreak goes above 0.4%. According to their calculations, currently, the country's mortality rate is between 0.1% and 0.4%.

Some have suggested that we shut down the country by imposing a nationwide health emergency lockdown. But this is quite futile as the disease is already in place within the community.

Microscopic view of influenza virus particles (Pic by Dr FA
Murphy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; source:
ah1n1.com)

How long should a shutdown go on for? One week, 10 days, or longer? What about the economic implications and the day-to-day running of the country and businesses? What happens when another surge appears? Do we need to have repeated cycles of national curfew?

It makes no practical sense to even consider this at this time. The actual numbers, while alarming to some, are still manageable.

So why do the growing numbers seem to imply that we are getting more and more infections, with what appears as a disproportionate number of deaths?

There is no clear or adequate answer to this. I do not believe that the Health Ministry is to blame for the forthright transparency, which it has been practising right from the outset.

There is organisational acknowledgement that our viral testing may have been less than adequate, and there have been long queues and frustrations from many worried patients, some of whom were sent home with no tests offered. Thus, there were and are many flu patients in the community who have not had confirmatory tests performed. This under-reporting would add to the lower numbers of laboratory-proven or confirmed A(H1N1) flu infections.

The World Health Organisation has estimated that for every confirmed case, there are at least another 20 patients who would have been infected. This means that most of these are not serious enough to be counted. Many would have had mild or even no symptoms. In this context, the actual numbers would have been grossly underestimated.

So it is unfair to state that the Health Ministry is manipulating the numbers to justify the growing death rate, which we have already predicted would happen simply based on the attack rate of this contagious flu.

We must inform the public that this pandemic will continue for at least another year or two, with the intensity likely to become less serious and less feared with time, unless the dreaded second wave of reassortment into a more virulent form of the H1N1 virus takes place. There is no indication that this second wave has taken place yet, even in Mexico, USA, UK or Australia.

Also, the complication rates appear to have plateaued, and most health authorities have learnt to cope with this and the expected number of deaths. The scenario in Malaysia is probably still evolving, with the peak still to come, but I would predict that the mortality rate would become less frightening as we cope with the complications better.

It is possible that many more Malaysians in the country have come into contact with this flu and are suffering very mildly from it. Most would have got better without much concern. It is those few who seem to get complications so quickly that make us afraid.

As with most communicable diseases, we will overcome this outbreak in time, but we need to be patient, vigilant and socially responsible, and work together.

Dr David KL Quek
President
Malaysian Medical Association

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself,..."

MMA President’s Inaugural Speech

49th MMA AGM, Friday, 29 May 2009, Sunway Resort and Spa Hotel

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation”
~ Robert F. Kennedy

Y. Berhormat Dato’ Sri Liow Tiong Lai, Minister of Health, Malaysia,
Y. Berbahagia, Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Dr. Hj. Mohd lsmail Merican, Director-General of Health Malaysia
Y. Berusaha Dato’ Dr. Khoo Kah Lin, Immediate Past President;
Y. Berusaha Dr. Mary Cardosa, first ever lady President-elect of the MMA,
Y. Berusaha Dr. Koh Kar Chai, organizing chair of the MMA 49th AGM, chairman of the Wilayah branch of the MMA
Y. Berusaha all Past Presidents of the MMA
Y. Bhg. Tan Sri-Tan Sri & Puan Sri-Puan Sri, Dato’-Dato’ and Datin-Datin,

Honoured guests, friends & fellow colleagues,
I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed upon me, mindful of the sacrifices and efforts borne by so many of our distinguished forerunners. Over the past 49 years, there have been 44 presidents of the MMA.

Gratitude & Acknowledgements:
I must acknowledge that over the years, I have been blessed for having worked with and having been mentored by some of the most respected pantheons of our medical profession.

I for one have learnt and benefited much from the vision, wisdom, philosophy, selfless commitment and impactful legacy of such great leaders.

I would like to acknowledge today, the leaders within the MMA whose ideas and ideals have personally helped inspire, shape and mould my professional character, they are:
• Dato’ Dr. Ronald McCoy,
• Dato’ Dr. Abdul Hamid Abdul Kadir,
• Dato’ Dr. TP Devaraj,
• the late Dr. MK Rajakumar.

Among others in the medical and health care scene who have taught, impressed, educated and supported me, especially in the statecraft, tenacity of purpose and dignified diligence of medical leadership are:
• Tan Sri Dr. RP Lingam,
• Datuk Dr. Athimulum,
• Datuk Dr. Yeoh Poh Hong,
• Dr. Milton Lum,
• Dato’ Dr. Lee Yan San,
• Dato’ Dr. Khoo Kah Lin,
• Datuk Dr. Arumugam,
• Datuk Dr. Teoh Siang Chin
• the late Dr. Tibbs Fernandez, and
• the late Dato’ Dr. Lim Say Wan.

I believe that as we endeavour to continue the legacy of our common mission, we have always to stand on the shoulders of giants before us. Clearly in my mind, these are our giants! Much can be learnt from their incalculable institutional memories.

At the personal level, I must also thank my parents, my mum Cecilia and my late father Paul who taught me Christian values, patience, hard work and perseverance. I’m sorry my late father did not live long enough to see me lead this esteemed association. Thank you Mum and Dad!

My wife and soul mate, Bae Ling, is my confidante extraordinaire, my sounding board, my other conscience and my better half! Thank you for still being there for me!

To my children Timothy and Samantha, thanks for being the sobering anchors which make my life worthwhile. I love you all!

Challenging Past Crises
The past several years for the MMA have been challenging and contentious. There appears to be a growing sense of dissatisfaction, of negativism, of frustration, as a result of real or imagined injustices. Perhaps, this is a sign of the times we’re in.

Partisan politicisation had cast blinding shadows over our greater purpose. I believe that not to recognize these problems would be remiss!

Although we went through an era of uncertainty and at times quite bitter acrimony, I believe that we have all emerged shaken, but stronger. In the final analysis, good sense and compromise through sincere dialogue, give and take, rather than rhetoric and innuendos triumphed.

We recognize that misunderstanding and differing interpretations of executive or councilor decisions or indecisions can sometimes blow up into seemingly uncompromising, implacable positions of conflict. Our fragile association can ill afford this.

In resolving crises such as these, we must remember that mistakes or miscues are often committed without willful intention to cheat or defraud the association or its members.

Perhaps, this collective angst reflects the eroding level of trust in our society. Perceived wrongs and highhanded antics seem to pervade our day-to-day experience, disturbing even shocking our accustomed equipoise and sense of fair play. Despite this, we must learn from our human foibles, and move on.

I respect dissent as a legitimate facet of any democracy. On the other hand dissenters too must also recognize realities for the common good. Whatever personal misgivings, we must respect the views of the majority, which must be the supreme arbiter of what our members want and decide.

Every member should seriously consider the wellbeing of the MMA. We must not become bogged down by things and affairs past, so much so, that these begin to stalemate our progress.

I would like to quote political scientist Geoff Mulgan (one of Britain’s top 100 intellectuals) who said:

“Good government should be illuminated by the future. But many governments live with their eyes on the rear-mirror, refighting ancient battles, and reigniting ancient enmities.”

Of course, we must learn from such crises, but these should create opportunities for improvement, rather than spawn paralyzing pessimism and skepticism. It is by being involved and engaged that we as concerned members, can help shape and guide MMA’s direction and purpose.

In my tenure as president, I hope to rise above such unconstructive activities from derailing our administration and policies. I will adhere to principles of greater transparency and accountability. I fully respect the fact that leadership styles are very personal and unique.

Dato’ Khoo had emphasised his softly-softly consensual approach, but this does not imply that mine would be so much more different! My approach however, will be somewhat more cerebral, a tad idealistic, and perhaps more based on principles rather than on tightly focused mundane issues.

Yet, I firmly believe that the MMA should be more expansive in its reach and its attention.
That said, we deserve the leaders that we have sanctioned to serve us, because we—the members—by ballot or by default, have elected them; as I have been, by those of you who have voted.

However, this sense of purpose and connectedness must belong to our members at large out there, whose voices deserve to be heard. Their choice of electing whom they want, on deciding the direction and purpose of the MMA, must not be taken away.

As the 45th president of the MMA, I will try my utmost not to disappoint you. I will do my level best to uphold the dignity and the prestige of our esteemed Association.

But we will need everyone’s help to make our association stronger, more relevant and more in tune, to tackle our staggering professional issues ahead.

Personal Journey
Although I have had ambitions to be a doctor since I was very young, I did not until recently envision that I would lead the MMA, some day.

It is indeed sobering to note that I’ve now been a physician for almost exactly 30 years…
30 years may be one generation for man, but for our profession, this would have been many generations of subtly and variedly taught doctors. We have had many newer crops of doctors, even more interested stakeholders and infinitely more complex healthcare issues!

The healthcare scene has evolved into a tremendously complex if unwieldy behemoth. We have cutting-edge technologies, avant-garde disciplines, greater skills, fashionable cures, newer hopes, yet unexpected newly deadly emerging diseases. Importantly, the expanding number of players and stakeholders and its escalating costs, have created this incredibly convoluted industry, which is undermining nations, the world over.

Therefore for the medical profession, we will need stronger, more decisive leadership, more focused directions and more meaningful motivation to achieve our goals. We need to harness and guide preferred methods of the way we practice medicine and how we conduct our future professionalism, resonant with the needs and expectations in this modern age.

The way we perceive medical care, interact with each other and our patients have all changed. Thus, I am keenly aware that trying to helm a cluster of highly intelligent and opinionated professionals will be even more challenging, sometimes exasperating, and often nerve wrecking. To address these challenges, will require the cooperation and understanding of all of you, our members.

Those of you who know me better, will know that I can be rather blunt and forward. Yet I am not one to take disagreements or harbour criticisms personally. I believe in the robust and fearless exercise of good ideas and well-reasoned arguments, anchored on solid ethical moorings, to help mould and influence society in whatever small ways possible—to enhance society’s worth and perhaps in a ‘pretentious’ way, even to help better mankind, in our little corner of the world!

I am that perpetual optimist who believes that some little good can and does emerge despite the overpowering cynicism and despondency that abounds in today’s world.

More than 10 years ago when researching for an editorial that I was writing, I was touched by what a singular exhortation, by the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy, a visionary leader imbued with an uncommonly passionate sense of humanitarian ideals and moral standing. He had said, and I quote:

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation ... It is from numberless, diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped.

“Each time a person stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, these ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”

These are the persuasions that I hope will guide my journey as I take on the onerous mantle of the MMA presidency. I believe that each one of us can participate by doing one act of random kindness at a time, one by one by one…

What is MMA’s Relevance to Today’s Physicians, to our rakyat?
Not for the very first time, the question of MMA’s relevance to today’s Malaysian doctors has been raised. Some years ago, such a timely question was raised by our very own DG of Health, who had noted our less than representative membership numbers and our occasional meandering directions.

With our membership growing so slowly or stagnating even, in spite of the huge increase in number of registered doctors in the country, it appears that our representation is quickly but surely contracting.

Our 8,201 members now pale in comparison to the more than 25,862 registered doctors nationwide—a mere 33%! Thus MMA represents only one-third of all our doctors, and the percentage is likely to decrease with each passing year. Nevertheless, the MMA remains the largest association representing doctors in this country.

Some have said that perhaps our time and influence has passed—that the MMA is no longer relevant. Some others have insinuated that MMA no longer carries the commitment or the clout of representing doctors’ interests.

Has the MMA been protecting our vaunted professionalism?

Have we been defending our more than straitjacketed practice issues?

Sadly, we must admit that there have been moments when we appear to have been floundering. We’ve been so engrossed with our own parochial infighting; internecine strife and politicking that we have failed to see the larger picture out there. We appeared to have lost our bearings.

We appear to have forgotten our purpose of serving our members. We’re seen to have been silent when certain of our medical professional interests had been encroached upon. I dare say, somewhere along the line, we have somewhat lost the plot that truly matters, at least that is the general perception.

For one, I do not believe and cannot accept that the MMA is a fraternal club just for pandering to some insular interests. It is not a boys’ club. It has to be more than that.

Perhaps, this is the time to rein in our baser instincts, tame our selfish inward-looking fixation, and finally get down to the brass tacks of leading and working for the doctors, and ultimately benefiting our patients. There really is much to be done, and we have precious little time to work on so many pressing problems and issues.

It is in this light that I wish to now address the issue of medical leadership. I am convinced that we have to start addressing where we’re heading, what our advocacy and policy issues are, for continuity and modernization of our medical association.

Interestingly, in yesterday’s MMA Annual Lecture, Dato’ Dr. Abdul Hamid had raised so many similar questions, despite the fact that we have not at all communicated on these issues, recently! Somehow, we seemed to have aligned our thinking that we have to take “the road less travelled.”

The MMA must seize our role and stamp our relevance!

We must learn how to harness and use our ‘power’ as the premier national representative body to help shape and influence national health issues, policies and direction. We have to encourage our younger leaders to come forwards and engage themselves with greater passion and enthusiasm.

Above all, we must move beyond our petty obsessions, important while these may appear to our limited frames of mind. We can better channel our energies toward greater, more purposeful activities, which enhance our medical profession and our practice conditions.

We must try and show our non-member doctors that we are still a force to be reckoned with; that we are indeed espousing their interests and welfare. We must enlighten them that they have a duty to join us so that we may have a bigger say and mandate when we pursue dialogues and representation with the authorities that be.

We must show that the MMA is the best hope for meaningful input and voice of the medical profession. We should actively work towards and gain more membership numbers.

We must not shortchange ourselves by trying to dis-empower members because of perceived slights, prejudices, or even ethnic racist considerations, that has been raised at today’s AGM discussions. We must not drive them even more into their comfort zone of apathy and resignation!

We must offer unselfish mentorship, by taking greater interests and willingness to learn new and contemporary knowledge and information about health care issues. We must recognize that we are not working in a vacuum, but in an environment beset by seemingly unpredictable challenges.

If representative members of our profession are blasé or ignorant of the changing landscape of our health care issues, we will be left behind. We will not be credible dialogue partners with other stakeholders of the health care industry, including the Ministry of Health.

Therefore, we must learn to identify important national-level issues, gain more in-depth interests and knowledge so that we can play a more meaningful role in helping to modify or revolutionize policies, which ultimately require change for the better. We must strive to remain relevant and engaged.

What are our Leadership Roles & Responsibilities?
I strongly believe in the natural dynamism of physicians—whether we are aware of it or not. As doctors, we are as in almost every society, natural leaders. Some may argue that unfortunately perhaps, not too many of us are emotionally or politically savvy enough, i.e. our EQ is simply too low!

In fact most of us are quite utterly apolitical and apathetic: we just want to work and get on with our own lives—most of us believe that we are simply doctors with a healing profession, and we’d like to be left alone to do just that…

However, this is too simplistic an attitude. Like it or not, we will continue to be buffeted by powerful winds of change and challenges, because health care has become too incredibly complex, too expensive, and too business-like. 13 billion ringgit or 7% of our national budget, in terms of the economic cake, is simply too big to ignore!

Therefore, it is naïve to imagine that we can simply ignore our role and our responsibility in trying to come to terms with its huge implications.

We must harness smarter Partnerships with all healthcare stakeholders
As physicians with unique talents and astute intelligence, we have that great and diverse capacity to infuse illustrious ideas and illuminating concepts, which can help further our healthcare governance and critically relevant practice issues.

As physicians, we can help direct forward-looking, on-the-ground policies, because we are at the forefront of this dynamic of constantly engaging with our patients, what ails them, and then some more.

We are our patients’ keepers
As medical professionals, our patients are our raison d’être, our sine qua non for existing. Without patients, there’d be no reason for doctors to exist, period. But because there will always be those who are ill, who fall sick, who become injured, there will always be need for a healer to answer to this social, this professional calling. We should thus, not be too willing to abdicate this role!

Importantly, as more and more of our role as physicians come into conflict or competition with society’s other demands, we must remain steadfast as our patients’ strongest advocate.

The rising role of insured care, managed care necessarily demands some degree of rationing and sometimes denial or delay of more costly or disputed medical or surgical therapies. We must ensure that such constraints do not lead to adverse consequences for our patients.

Responsible ‘gate-keeping’ must not infringe upon our ethical practice to place our patients’ interests first, and not the other way round! Similarly, the converse of placing our own vested or venal interest first is also wrong and is an unacceptable moral hazard.

Physician autonomy must be defended, protected, supported
Recent controversies regarding forensic medical examinations and reports have posed a serious dilemma and cast a cloud of dreaded fear among medical practitioners. Our professional autonomy has been threatened.

At this juncture I would like to state categorically that I have no political agenda, but only firm personal convictions of what is ethically correct—I have always subscribed to stringent beliefs in universal sociopolitical and human rights, which transcend personal ambitions or self-interests.

I have always had the greatest respects for our colleagues at the Ministry of Health, particularly the DG of Health, and have admired their great dedication to service as well as their goodwill towards our professional brotherhood. We have had and still have an excellent working relationship with the MOH. What we are more concerned with, are the other instruments of power where misguided authorities have acted with increasingly arbitrary sometimes, extrajudicial excesses.

I firmly believe that any pursuit of better ethical standards is not irregular or out of place. Adherence to rigorous edicts of correct medical behaviour in line with our other medical brethren globally, can only elevate to higher standards our medical professionalism, especially vis-à-vis difficult thorny conditions under state constricted landscapes.

Thus, as party to such universal medical ethics, the MMA must forcefully endorse the right of our physicians to act independently and without fear of reprisals from state agencies, which might have their own directed or political agendas. The recent pressures and possible political and police intimidation on doctors making medical reports or autopsies must be strongly opposed.

As physicians, we must always stand on the side of the presumed innocent, the detainees, including every prisoner. We must insist that all custodial deaths should be fully investigated. Indeed in any modern society, custodial coercive techniques, injuries or deaths should be things of the past.

Simply put, there should be no carte blanche to torture any person in custody no matter the circumstances or suspicion of guilt. The arbitrary presumed greater good for the majority should never override that irrevocable civic right of the individual.

The Tokyo Declaration on Torture by the World Medical Association has clearly delineated where physicians must stand on this issue, without compromise. As medical doctors, we cannot be complicit in these possible excesses of authoritarian abuses—otherwise we all stand accused of tolerating our own little ‘Guantanamo’ or ‘Abu Ghraib’!

Thus, in line with our consistent premise and accord with the World Medical Association, the MMA must lead and will engage vigorously to defend our scrupulous position on such ethical and practice issues, under my leadership. We will not shy away from issues, which might be deemed too politically incorrect.

Furthermore, if we do not stand by our medical colleagues, how can they on their own withstand the lonely if overwhelming pressures to function with responsibility, justice and professional honesty?

In the early 1900s, Dr. Sun Yat Sen, physician-founder of modern China challenged the oppressive power structures and championed improvement in the lives of millions of his countrymen, by spearheading independence from Imperial China. He believed that “physicians are the natural attorneys of the poor, and social problems fall to a large extent within their jurisdiction.”

We must therefore, safeguard these staunch institutional values to the best of our abilities and commitment, so that we can be assured of our constancy with our medical brethren worldwide.

Our standard of quintessential professionalism can help conscientise our medical community, and enhance our common humanity. We can help remind our colleagues and our citizens that moral core values cannot be compromised, and that we are not alone in espousing these higher standards.

Caring Ethos
Having said that, as doctors, we must return to our Caring Ethos. We must regularly remind ourselves that among the professions, we are perhaps the only one that demands a caring value system. This has been called and imposed upon us from a long line of tradition, which spans more than 2,500 years. This is made personally explicit and binding when we take our Hippocratic oath, or its equivalent, when we graduate from medical schools, the world over.

Sometimes, who we are, and what we should be doing slips from our consciousness. These days, it is easier to regress into our baser instincts. Instincts, which appear to be all too human, yet perhaps, too influenced by and too fixated on the all-pervasive consumerist tempo of the free-market system.

We sometimes let our better judgement succumb to the demands and lure of lucre, of money, of personal and/or professional arrogance, which beclouds our inner voice, our true vocation.

Sometimes, we just get too immersed in the tedium of work and more work that we forget to reflect on this. We move along mindlessly, oblivious of the many forces that impact on our professional status, our gradually eroding if still circumscribed worldview.

Practice Issues
In the daily grind of routine—that heady pursuit of monetary gains, that overpowering ‘busy-ness’–we forget our healing art.

We distractedly dissipate our empathy, our special relationship with our patients. We lose that subtle touch of healing, that singular ‘intimacy’ with which we have been entrusted.

We let those “mystical chords of healing” slip away from us. We fail to harness and weave that innate physician attribute, that ‘shamanic magic’, which is by itself so powerfully therapeutic. Given with empathy, this special relationship may sometimes even supersede the need for medicines, intervention and the like…

Perhaps, it’s the overpowering commercialism so steeped in today’s medical practice, which has helped extinguish this sense of therapeutic healing. We are no longer admired as benign benevolent healers, but increasingly seen as purveyors of a commodity to be purchased…

Continuing Professional Development/CME
Nevertheless, we are called upon to do better—our patients expect this of us: to deliver safe, competent, and up-to-date care. Our regulators will soon insist on a minimum standard of continuing professional development and education.

It is estimated that perhaps only 10 to 20% of all practicing doctors ever bother with CPD programmes. A huge 80% out there, remain totally oblivious of the need to update themselves and their limited, possibly outdated medical knowledge.

We must choose to reverse this pathetic trend. In the revised Medical Act, this will address the statutory requirements for physician re-licensing, one that we will have to comply with, regardless…

Private Health Care Facilities & Services Act & Regulations (PHCFSA-PHCFSR)
As physicians, we have always been jealously proud of our autonomy and capacity to self-regulate. Alas, this is almost universally no longer the case. Rising costs and unsatisfactory service complaints have prodded policy-makers the world over, to impose more and more regulatory constraints on the medical profession.

By being apathetic, silent, uninvolved, uninterested, we have been overtaken by new laws, overweening managed care, litigation excesses, and lately painful new regulations which, seem to micromanage and even criminalise so many of the practice issues of private sector doctors.

Like them or hate them, the new regulations and laws are here to stay. But they are not benign: their sting has yet to be modulated despite our initial dialogue sessions with the MOH to smooth out the incongruities of some of these less palatable regulations.

It is because of these uncertainties and potential dangers of over-interpretation that we see these regulations as overbearing and unkind toward the private medical practitioner.

These are some of the modifications we have sought, which must be rectified quickly with the Minister and the officials of the MOH.

These must not be left to fester with uncertainty, to be overzealously interpreted and implemented by some enthusiastic practice division officials… We urge the Minister and his officials to help us resolve these as expediently and as justly as possible.

Medical Errors & Medico-legal Challenges
Medical mistakes are nowadays less and less tolerated or accepted by anyone—be they patients, their relatives or even our own professionals, and certainly not by the hovering predatory litigation lawyers.

The margins for medical error are diminishing every day; our patients’ expectations are growing, their demands for more disclosure mounting, and their endurance for medical mistakes or untoward outcomes, waning.

The recent end-2006 Federal Court adoption of the Rogers vs. Whitaker principle (instead of the physician-friendlier Bolam test) of adequate disclosure of material risk has placed a greater burden of proof of non-negligence on doctors.

There is that real danger that the judicial treatment of medical negligence issues may be extended more widely. The medical profession must vigorously oppose this possibility, because this would severely handicap our uncertain science and place us at grievous odds of difficult medical therapeutic options or decisions.

One way to help lessen this spectre of rising medical negligence is to stay current and knowledgeable. We must learn to constantly sweep away the cobwebs of old and outdated practices—we have to update beyond deeply rooted boundaries of rapidly obsolescent concepts.

But medical knowledge is not enough. We must communicate better. We must interact and discuss more comprehensively with our patients and their loved ones. We have to document that, procedures and risks have been well understood or disclosed. We must ensure that enough information has been expounded, before embarking on any medical or surgical procedure. No longer is it enough to simply push ahead paternalistic “doctor-knows-best” practices…

How else can doctors/physicians help maintain or advocate for a better image and trust from the public at large?

We must rekindle the Power of the Physician-Patient Encounter.
We have now more than 25,862 practising physicians in the country. If we estimate that each doctor interacts with at least 10 patients a day, this works out to some 250,000 doctor-patient contacts every day. Potentially this works out to some 7,500,000 physician-patient encounters in one month!

Thus, there are abundant opportunities to help present the unique face of the physician to our patients. If we present ourselves poorly, this will clearly leave unhappy and poor impressions, which will only sully our reputation…

Conversely, we can do much to enhance our image, our concern, our empathy, our caring nature—if we constantly remind ourselves that with each and every one of our patient encounters, we can have a huge and tremendous impact in helping to shape our kindlier face and profession.

We must make use of this power of engagement, this power to show our true professionalism and our altruistic best of what it means to be caring physicians.

Universal Healthcare Access: Lobbying and Advocacy planning/SIKK:
The MMA has always advocated for some form of universal access to health care for all Malaysians. Sadly after so many decades, this has remained a hotchpotch entity of a disjointed public-private mix—a variable partnership that is anything but sufficiently integrated.
Thus, gaps in access and failure to provide timely and affordable medical care, especially for more specialized tertiary therapies still bedevil our system.

There should be a better mechanism to address health care access in Malaysia. To be sure, no country has ever gotten this right, and every nation is still grappling with and tempering the excesses and the failures, to ease the public concerns about health care standards, access and its mounting costs.

The much-awaited National Health Insurance Scheme (SIKK) remains mired in the details and the implementation. The public is largely in the dark, and those who are concerned (such as Aliran, CAP, FOMCA and the Coalition Against Health Care Privatisation or Gabungan Membantah Penswastaan Perkhidmatan Kesihatan) have voiced very strong objections to its possible enactment.

These fretful focus groups pose several legitimate concerns, which should be addressed by any responsible authority. Questions about how to collect adequately, comprehensively and fairly, the premiums for such a scheme remain unanswered—which would endanger the community-rated contributions expected.

The exact nature of the roles of the private versus the public sectors following this new projected schema is also unclear.

The MMA is necessarily interested in this development, and has been offering its concerns and recommendations at various dialogues with the Ministry of Health. However, we too share many of the controversial points about its practicality at this juncture.

Perhaps as of now, the best approach would be not to overhaul the current system, especially when it is not yet broke! Perhaps, all we need to do is to tweak and fine-tune it to perform better!

Physician Remuneration
In this context, we have to acknowledge that our public sector doctors have had some success at attracting more reasonable salaries and perks, these past few years.

We thank the Minister, the DG of Health, the MOH and the PSD for agreeing to many of our suggestions to improving our lot. Tax exemptions and incentives have also been allowed which makes the take-home pay for public service doctors much more substantial.

We continue to urge for better remuneration and better service conditions for our sacrificing doctors in the public sector. Perhaps, with these enhanced benefits, public sector doctors can continue to serve more happily, rather than yearn to migrate to the private sector; the grass is not necessarily greener out there!

For the private sector however, there are still some public misgivings and disgruntled mutterings that doctors are over-charging, that medical care is too ‘expensive’.

Doctors’ professional fees have nearly always been misunderstood to be the main cause of escalating health care costs. This is far from the truth. Doctors’ fees take up some 15 to 45% of the total overall fees for various therapies/hospitalizations. However, mandated fee schedules now enshrined in the 2006 PHCFS regulations have served to control these charges.

As a medical professional, I make no apologies for our medical compatriots who do make money, with some doing very well indeed. This is the innate part of our human nature to wish, to want to do well of ourselves—we must recognize that this is indeed the ranking peak of Maslow’s self-actualisation.

Our professionalism, our top grades for competitive entry into med-school, our arduous and long training, our expertise and skills are often forgotten in the trade-off debate as to what is considered fair and reasonable wages.

At the same time, it cannot be denied that our fees for private care, when compared with those in the region have been nearer the lower end of the spectrum, and that insurance premiums have not risen to realistic levels required of our current status as a middle income developing nation.

Thus, this tussle for fair remuneration continues. The MMA will continue to champion a fairer deal for medical doctors as part of our legitimate representation for the profession.

That said however, the MMA also has a social responsibility to remind every doctor that the practice of medicine is not to be equated with other professions—we are imbued with that critical service tradition that necessarily mandates a greater expectation of altruism and benevolence and which marks us apart from others.

The fifth schedule of the revised MMA professional fees was completed in end 2008. We have passed this on to the Ministry of Health for its action to include this revision in the PHCFS Regulations. The previous fee schedule revision was last carried out in 2002, more than 7 years ago.

We are mindful that the current financial and economic meltdown has cast an ominous shadow over the state of the economy here as well as globally. Because of this, the MMA Council has in its wisdom and its social responsibility, agreed to delay this declaration of the new fee revision for the time being.

At the same time, we thank the Ministry of Health for seriously looking into updating this revised scheme and urge that these be quickly incorporated into the regulations, soonest possible.

Medical Education and Possible Glut of Physicians in the future
Dato’ Dr Abdul Hamid has already discussed at length the potential problems of uncontrolled medical colleges and graduates, and the potential for physician glut in the near future.

With 23 functioning medical colleges in the country producing some 1500 medical graduates annually, plus another 1000 or more overseas-trained doctors returning, we worry that there will be an uncontrolled glut where many medical graduates would be underemployed or worse, unemployed or poorly employed.

While we recognize that there is mal-distribution of doctor deployment to rural communities, we also fear worsening urban competition. As it now stands, in the KL-Klang Valley, the physician-people ratio is already 1:398!

Therefore, we need to be more pro-active in ensuring that the increase in the number of medical graduates be carefully modulated to accommodate the true needs of the population, the country.

But this may not be the only problem, as free trade agreements loom in the offing…

WTO/GATS/AFTA 2010.
We need to address the opening and freeing up of our health care services to ASEAN: AFTA, (ASEAN Free Trade Agreement) comes into force in 2010, i.e. in less than a year’s time!

Together with our increase in medical graduate numbers, employment and job opportunities for doctors would become even more challenging. The opening of the ASEAN market of freer movement of physicians and healthcare services is expected become quite unsettling.

Uniformity of standards and regulations should be considered to stem the unfettered influx of physicians of questionable quality or need. There is no doubt that there will be fiercer competition where many of our own homegrown doctors will be undermined, and their livelihood compromised.

Being a medical graduate will no longer be a sure thing for employability. Thus, we encourage our medical colleges to review their courses and standards, so that they can train medical graduates who can be world-beaters and at par with the best in the world, and not just jaguh kampung!

We also urge the government and Ministries of Health and Higher Education to review their objectives and policies vis-à-vis these changing supply-demand dynamics.

Flooding the market with medical graduates without due regard to their needed numbers or standards would be counterproductive when many of these may become unemployable, or who could only find other non-medical jobs instead. This would underscore the waste of having to undergo such expensive and rigorous training, in the first place.

Such precious educational resources could be put to better and more productive use—let’s produce doctors who would be practicing with pride as doctors, rather than become redundant and retrained as nursing personnel, medical representatives, administrators, etc, as has happened in some countries.

Closer Collaboration & Engagement with like-minded professionals and groups
Although the MMA represents some 8,201 doctors in Malaysia, two-thirds of all registered doctors still choose to remain outside our ambit. Notwithstanding this, their practices and livelihoods to some extent, continue to depend on our influence, our leadership and our actions.

I am aware that there are other like-minded medical and/or health advocacy groups out there. These smaller societies also represent somewhat more defined vested interests of some of our doctors; importantly these are not always mutually exclusive.

MMA does not and will not have the exclusive right to usurp the attention, the involvement or the representation of every medical practitioner.

We know that human beings are diverse enough to choose different associations to cater to their disparate needs and interests. These are as legitimate and as forcefully influential as their leaders would have them be.

Some amongst our MMA members have expressed dismay that there should be other societies out there who appear to duplicate our function and our purpose. They feel that these smaller groups would dilute our common purpose and distract our rightful attention to detail.

However, this wish to exclude others in the same medical profession who choose to be more active elsewhere, is misguided in my view. We should work towards more inclusive and collaborative positions of cooperation and consistency of objectives. Most importantly we should work towards a final common good for physicians as well as for our patients.

Let’s face this honestly: some of these medical societies do have some very dynamic if narrower interest bases. They obviously represent some of the urgings and intentions of some of our other doctors, because of their ability to deliver on certain issues relevant to their perceived interests and benefits.

Each society has its own strength and occasionally its own singular expertise, which may complement or even exceed our own MMA’s collective vision, action or inaction.

Instead of shunning these groups as competitors, we should be more generous and magnanimous. I strongly believe that we should harness all these strengths to enhance our capacity as a more comprehensive and complete front for our shared bargaining lobby with the authorities that be.

Under my leadership we will engage these groups more closely and work with them to further our professional agenda and interests, and I believe ultimately we will also boost our patients’ wellbeing and benefits.

Therefore, the MMA under my leadership will engage meaningfully with the Federation of the Associations of Private Medical Practitioners of Malaysia, the Association of Specialists in Private Medical Practice, the Islamic Medical Association, Malaysian Pharmaceutical Society, Consumer Groups, Coalition for Healthcare Initiatives, Association of Private Hospitals of Malaysia, Physicians for Peace and Social Responsibility, Human Rights Advocacy Groups (including SUHAKAM, Suaram, HAKAM), and the Bar Council on issues which we share or have common grounds to pursue.

Paramount Importance of Engaging & Collaborating with MOH
Needless to say, we must engage and work closely with the Ministry of Health and its officials on issues which pertain to and embroil the medical profession and its members, as well as our rights and responsibilities vis-à-vis our patients. We note that 15,862 doctors are working within the MOH, while some 10,070 doctors are in private practice, as of 31 Dec 2008 (data from Dr Wan Mazlan, MMC Secretary).

We wish to reiterate that we have had some excellent working relationship with the MOH on most issues pertaining to the medical profession. However, whilst many of the issues pertinent to public service issues have been satisfactorily resolved and are regularly engaged in collaborative progress and dialogue, issues with regards private medical practice have been less collegial and/or agreeable.

In particular we are extremely heartened that promotional aspects in the public sector have been tremendously improved, with almost a hundred senior doctors having been promoted to JUSA C and above—we wish to record our sincerest thanks to the DG of Health, YBhg. Tan Sri Datuk Ismail Merican, for putting his personal touch, and commitment to help bring this about. We fully acknowledge his positive input to help our Health Minister make important and gracious gestures toward our medical fraternity and our interests. Thank you Tan Sri!

We understand the constraints and his singular commitment to enhance the standards of healthcare in the country, and we fully support his conviction and his passion.

But alas, while well intentioned, the means toward this end, is sometimes fraught with contrary approaches, which lead to conflicting interests among various stakeholders, with the medical doctors sometimes receiving the shorter end of the stick. This, we must admit have sometimes created some friction between the MMA and the MOH.

We will try very hard to mitigate such differences in styles and work toward closer cooperation and ultimately for the greatest benefits to everyone, including physicians! Thus, while we cannot always agree with all the purported MOH policies and plans unreservedly, we will continue to share and contribute our ideas and expertise to establish a better healthcare system for Malaysia.

As a vital bulwark against unseen or unforeseen practical professional problems, the MMA will shoulder its balanced responsibility to help guide and shape some of these plans and policies in a manner that agrees with our objectives and that of our patients’ and physicians’ interests.

Although we have in the past been quietly, successfully working towards greater physician benefits, these have not always been understood by doctors out there, who perceive that we have been too silent, too slow, too unresponsive, perhaps too submissive.

It may be because of this negative perception that the MMA has not been able to attract more membership and support, of late. Thus, I do believe it is time to raise our noise level, to be more engaged, so that our standpoints can be better appreciated.

Under my leadership style, I have campaigned on being more vocal and more engaged in physician and healthcare issues, and this I intend to carry out as promised. Therefore, the MMA under my watch will be more resolute and will be more vocal.

This is not to say that we will be arrogant or unreasonable, but it is important for us as a medical body to articulate our viewpoints and our convictions more clearly and perhaps, more publicly.

I believe that under our current sociopolitical climate of greater participation and expectation, our doctors demand this—doctors are urging for a greater voice and say.

Therefore, we will not be too fearful of putting our viewpoints across if these are believed to be the best solutions for our healthcare system.

We will cooperate where we share common ground, but we will also not be too afraid to disagree where such decisions and regulations impinge upon our practice and our livelihood. We will of course not bend our principles simply for our own narrow professional interests per se, but will make measured responses of workable and practical solutions, which benefit above all our patients’ interests, without betraying our own.

Where physician professionalism and autonomy are threatened, we will voice our concerns clearly and earnestly so that we remain relevant and consistent with the tenets of global medical professionalism and ethical practices, and as a member signatory to the World Medical Association and the United Nations.

If we show greater leadership, then I believe others would also agree to be part of our show and strength of purpose. If on the other hand, other similar societies are more dynamic and innovative, then we should not be too proud to acknowledge their strengths and leadership—we must work towards a win-win partnership to attain our greater common goals.

We must share a more inclusive attitude with all who wish to join us in enhancing our medical professionalism and practice. We must refrain from excluding membership participation just because of minutiae and trivial differences. This will instead turn away many who would have joined our forces to move in tandem within the MMA. We lose membership gain and possibly too we lose our legitimate representation based on strength of numbers.

Therefore, we must work harder to show that we can still attract our younger physicians to join us. We must show that we are still relevant—that we still have a greater purpose of policies and influence, within which our new members can take greater pride of place.

We cannot afford to simply be disagreeable for disagreement’s sake. We cannot afford to remain a close-looped fraternity, only looking after our diminishing membership—we must become more representative and attractive. We must move forwards. We must show greater leadership of purpose and determination.

Concluding Remarks
I believe we can and we must be bold enough to change, to believe in the art of the impossible…
US President Barack H. Obama (in is Inauguration speech, 20 Jan 2009) said, and I quote:

“… that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of short-cuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the fainthearted—for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things—some celebrated but more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.”

Each and every one of us has that little something that we do, most of the time obscurely and outside the mainstream of our consciousness or attention. We carry on in our mundane labors, the best that we can, quietly and with dignity.

As medical professionals we can do no less. Indeed, we are called upon to do even more. Let’s make our profession even more luminous as we enter into the new century. Allow me to paraphrase yet another segment of Barack Obama’s inaugural message:

“The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation.”

How aptly these words reflect the profession of medicine!

Let us practice the noble art of medicine as has been enjoined upon us from time immemorial!

Let’s engage more meaningfully and help shape the kind of medical practice that we’d all be proud of.

Let’s find ways to ensure that healthcare is not simply an unreachable luxury only for the privileged few, but one that every Malaysian citizen can access without barriers.

Let’s work to find common solutions, which will benefit all, but especially those in need, i.e. our less-well-of or uninsured patients.

Let’s work towards a common system where healthcare is not splintered and dichotomized among those who can afford and those who cannot.

There is much that needs to be done, and more that should be considered and thought about.

Let us doctors and the MMA concern ourselves with more and more of our actual medical professional issues, instead of being bogged down in enervating trivialities of administrative lapses.

Let’s remind ourselves what philosopher-ethicist James Q. Wilson had said, that:

"Mankind's moral sense is not a strong beacon light, radiating outward to illuminate in sharp outline all that it touches. It is, rather, a small candle flame, casting vague and multiple shadows, flickering and sputtering in the strong winds of power and passion, greed and ideology. But brought close to the heart and cupped in one's hands, it dispels the darkness and warms the soul."

~ James Q Wilson, in The Moral Sense, 1997, p251. Free Press Paperbacks, NY.

Finally, I would like to paraphrase Hilary Clinton: “We'll have some ups and some downs. We'll face some obstacles along the way.” Let’s rise above parochial interests and work towards achieving our collective objectives.

Recent challenges and setbacks for the medical profession should not cause too much despair and despondency for doctors. Our own controversial administrative crises should not dampen our spirit of resilience and strength.

On May 24, 2009, Catholics celebrated World Communication Sunday. Pope Benedict in his message for that day said, and I quote

“Life is not just a succession of events or experiences: it is a search for the true, the good and the beautiful. It is to this end that we make our choices; it is for this end we exercise our freedom.”

Finally, I’d like to leave you all with this Chinese saying:

“Let’s wake up the earth from lethargy! When winter comes, can spring be far behind?”

(Interestingly, William Shelley had also written almost an identical ‘Ode to the Wind’: “O Wind, if Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?”)

I thank you for your patience, indulgence and kind attention!

---------------------------ooooo00000ooooo-----------------------------------