Monday, November 9, 2009

UK Daily Mail: Side-effects alert for all statin users

Side-effects alert for all statin users: link to depression and memory loss?

By Jenny Hope
Daily Mail, Last updated at 10:57 AM on 09th November 2009

Bottle of pills
New warning: Thousands of users of statins have suffered side effects

New health warnings are to be issued over popular cholesterol-lowering drugs after evidence that thousands of users suffer side effects such as depression and sexual problems.

More than six million adults who are prescribed statins by their GPs will be told about five new ' undesirable effects' in leaflets issued with packets of the drugs.

These are sleep disturbances, memory loss, sexual dysfunction, depression and a rare lung disease that can kill if left untreated.

But some doctors have criticised delays by the Government's drug safety watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

The MHRA signalled the need for updated warnings in February last year but disagreements about the wording have held up the changes.

Dr Ike Iheanacho, editor of the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin which conducts independent reviews of evidence on drugs, said most patients and doctors were unaware of the newly identified problems.

But he stressed that patients should not stop taking statins, which are credited with saving 10,000 lives a year by the British Heart Foundation.

Dr Iheanacho said: 'Statins are of unquestioned value in the prevention of cardiovascular events and are used by increasing numbers of people.

'However, when new data emerges on their unwanted effects, it is crucial that they are incorporated into the product information.'

A review of studies by the MHRA in February 2008 concluded there was enough evidence from clinical trials and patient reports to identify the new problems as a 'class effect'.

This means all statins may trigger the problems.

Statins Graphic

It found up to 12 per cent of patients taking part in one clinical trial suffered sleep disturbances such as insomnia, while 11 per cent of users in the same trial had depression and three per cent some level of memory loss.

Another study suggested 12 per cent of statin patients had erectile dysfunction. Overall, there was a much lower rate of side effects but, given the huge number of users, this would add up to thousands of patients being affected.

Very rarely statins may lead to interstital lung disease, which can cause respiratory failure if untreated.
Dr Iheanacho, in the latest issue of the Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, said his inquiries showed the delay in updating leaflets was caused by one of the drug companies disagreeing with the proposed wording. 'This situation is unacceptable,' he added.

A spokesman for the MHRA said the time frame for the new leaflets would depend on 'movement in the supply chain' for the drugs. She said: 'Once the MHRA approves a new leaflet the company has three months to print and use it.'

LA Times: Americans Spend Billions on Alternative Therapies

Americans Spend Billions on Alternative Therapies

Many Americans like Wittman choose to treat themselves with complementary and alternative medicine in lieu of surgery, pharmaceuticals or other traditional care. Their numbers have been steadily climbing over the last decade.

According to a July study from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, based on interviews with more than 23,300 adults during the 2007 National Health Interview Survey, almost 40% of adults use some form of complementary and alternative medicine to treat a variety of conditions.

They spent about $33.9 billion on these practices in 2007, accounting for about 11.2% of the public's total out-of-pocket health expenditures. In 1997, the last time such a survey was taken, the figure was $27 billion.

"Whatever this amount of the population is doing is no longer fringe," says Dr. Tracy Gaudet, executive director of Duke Integrative Medicine, part of the Duke University Health System. "We have to figure out what they are looking for that they can't find in conventional medicine."

Medicine outside the mainstream goes by many names -- naturopathy, complementary, alternative and integrative medicine -- partly because its umbrella covers almost any practice or product that is not generally taught in medical school or offered by traditional medical doctors. It encompasses a broad array of practices: crystal gazing, drinking green smoothies, taking fish oil, practicing yoga.

Alternative therapies are used most commonly to treat conditions such as back, joint and arthritis pain, colds and depression. The new study found the most popular therapies to be natural products, deep breathing, meditation, chiropractic and massage.

Self-care, at $22 billion, accounted for the majority of spending, mostly on nonvitamin, nonmineral, natural products. The most popular supplements are fish oil, glucosamine, echinacea and flaxseed. Americans spent $4 billion on yoga, tai chi and qigong classes, and $2.9 billion on homeopathic medicine.

The survey found that visits to practitioners overall have decreased by about 50% since 1997, with the biggest drop seen by providers of energy healing and relaxation techniques. An exception was acupuncture, whose providers saw a threefold increase from 1997 to 2007.

For years, there has been a false assumption that users are anti-establishment and alternative types who choose it over conventional treatments -- but the data suggests otherwise, complementary medicine experts say. Dr. Mimi Guarneri, medical director of Scripps Center for Integrative Medicine in La Jolla, says that these are regular people who want more help staying well.

"The good news about Western medicine is that it responds well in an acute setting -- if they have a heart attack, stroke or are hit by a car," she says. "When you look at other healing traditions, prevention is the first step, treatment is the last step."

But the trend worries many medical experts, although they acknowledge that some alternative therapies seem useful -- acupuncture for treating back pain, for example, and exercise and dietary changes for better regulation of blood sugar.

A 2008 study in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings found, for example, that patients who exercised, ate a low-fat diet and took fish oil and red yeast rice supplements over a three-month period reduced their bad, or LDL, cholesterol by 42%. A group taking the cholesterol medication Zocor saw a 39% LDL reduction.

But many more of the therapies are unproven or untested. Echinacea, ginko biloba and shark cartilage all came up ineffective in recent studies. A June Associated Press article highlighted the fact that after 10 years and $2.5 billion in research, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine has not found any alternative medicine that works, save patients taking ginger for chemotherapy-induced nausea and limited uses for acupuncture, yoga, massage and relaxation techniques such as meditation.

Almost $3 billion is spent annually on homeopathic medicine, for example, but there is no hard evidence to show that it is effective. The treatment, which is based on the theory that "like cures like," offers patients highly diluted solutions of natural substances that create similar symptoms. (An insomniac, for example, would be given a solution with a small amount of caffeine.) A number of homeopathy's key concepts "are not consistent with the current understanding of science, particularly chemistry and physics," the complementary medicine center notes on its website.

"I think people using alternative medicines are wasting their money and are being fooled into thinking they are getting something that is beneficial for them," says Dr. Jerome Kassirer, distinguished professor at Tufts University School of Medicine and former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Then there's the issue of safety. Herbs and supplements used by alternative health practitioners are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration because they are considered food, not pharmaceuticals. Thus, their purity is not guaranteed. The FDA has identified concerns with some dietary supplements that have been adulterated with drugs, mislabeled or may contain harmful substances including kava, ephedra and comfrey. A listing of alerts is on its website at www.fda.gov/Food/Dietary Supplements/Alerts/default .htm.

Some supplements -- such as St. John's Wort and ginko biloba -- also are known to interfere with conventional drugs, but many supplement users do not discuss the supplements they take with their doctors.

Gaudet says that medical students at Duke -- who are required as part of training to spend some time "loitering" in health food stores -- find that most consumers get information on how to use supplements from the health food store clerks. And a 2007 study by the complementary center and AARP looking at medical practices of people aged 50 and older found that 63% have used some form of alternative medicine but less than one-third told their doctor.

"There are some of these alternative medicine potions that can be harmful," Kassirer says. "And I think people treat themselves when they should be seeing a doctor, and that can result in a delay in necessary treatment."

Alternative medicine practitioners counter that most of the therapies, even if not effective, are not likely to harm. "I think many herbal remedies are quite gentle compared to strong drugs. . . . They aren't necessarily all safe, but by and large they have gentle effects," Briggs says.

Nor are all the issues unique to complementary medicine, Gaudet says, offering as an example: In many areas of traditional medicine, such as surgery, rigorous trials are rarely completed.

It's also unreasonable to argue that alternative therapies must be studied as thoroughly as a lot of mainstream medical practices, Guarneri says. The research should be as strong as a therapy's potential for risks.

Certainly, a new chemotherapy treatment should be rigorously tested, she says. But "I don't need a 2-million-person double-blind, randomized trial to tell someone to eat blueberries because they are low in sugar and high in antioxidants."

H1N1 Update: CDC Releases 'Quick Facts' for Providers on Antiviral Drug Use

H1N1 Update: CDC Releases 'Quick Facts' for Providers on Antiviral Drug Use
At Friday's CDC press briefing on 2009 H1N1 flu, Dr. Anne Schuchat stressed the importance of antiviral drugs for severe illness and directed clinicians to a fact sheet on "some of the myths and misconceptions about antivirals."

Among the CDC's "Quick Facts for Clinicians on Antiviral Treatments for 2009 H1N1":
  • Although initiating treatment within 48 hours of symptom onset is preferable, many patients (including those hospitalized or at high risk for severe illness) may still benefit if treatment is started later.
  • While antivirals are advised for patients with heightened risk, even those without risk factors might benefit, making clinical judgment "essential."
  • If flu is suspected and treatment seems warranted, antivirals should be started before laboratory confirmation of illness.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

H1N1 Update: JAMA: Factors Associated with Deaths and Hospitalizations

H1N1 Update: Factors Associated with Deaths and Hospitalizations
Although patients hospitalized for 2009 H1N1 influenza infection are younger on average than those hospitalized for seasonal flu, people aged 50 and older have the highest death rates.






Researchers analyzed some 1100 cases who were hospitalized for, or had died from, pandemic influenza in California in the first 4 months of the outbreak. Among their principal findings, presented in the current JAMA:

















 
  • The median age of the cases was 27.
  • Hospitalization rates were highest among infants under age 1 and lowest among the elderly.
  • Case-fatality rates — at 11% overall — were highest among those 50 and older and lowest in children under 18.
  • Two thirds had underlying medical conditions associated with severe disease, and over half were obese.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

H1N1 flu vaccine must be free and safe for high uptake.. Hong Kong researchers say

Swine flu vaccine must be free and safe for high uptake

Acceptability of A/H1N1 vaccination during pandemic phase of influenza A/H1N1 in Hong Kong: population based cross sectional survey
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.b3794


Almost half of adults surveyed in Summer 2009 in Hong Kong (45%) say they would take up free swine flu vaccination. However, this figure drops to around 1 in 7 (15%) if the price they have to pay for the vaccine reaches $HK200 (£16; Euro 17; $26). In the absence of proved efficacy and safety, the figure decreases to less than 1 in 20 (5%), according to one of the first studies on behavioural intentions and A/H1N1 vaccination, published on bmj.com today.

The authors, led by Professor Lau at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, conclude that uptake of swine flu vaccination among the general population is unlikely to be high and would be sensitive to price and safety of the vaccine.

The results of the study also reveal that more than 6 out of 10 (63%) people mistakenly believe that the efficacy of the vaccine had been confirmed by clinical trials and around one in six (16%) believe it is necessary for all Hong Kong people to be vaccinated against swine flu.

In September 2009, there were over 22,000 confirmed swine flu cases in Hong Kong resulting in 15 associated deaths. The Hong Kong government has proposed to purchase 5 million shots of the vaccine and said it would initially be offered to 2 million high risk groups. The government also estimated that 500,000 people could voluntarily pay for vaccination; however pricing has still not been agreed.

Lau and colleagues used a telephone questionnaire to interview a random sample of 301 adults between 2-8 July, after the announcement of A/H1N1 as a pandemic on 11 June. Telephone numbers were randomly selected from current telephone directories (over 95% of households in Hong Kong have a telephone line installed), and at least three calls were made before the number was considered invalid. Interviews were done in the evening (from 6.30pm to 10pm) to avoid over-representation of people not working.

The response rate was 80%. Respondents were between 18 and 60 years of age, 55% were female and 47% were below 40 years old.

Participants were also asked about their knowledge of the vaccine, the seriousness of the pandemic and their perception of risk. A third (30%) mistakenly believed that more than 1% of those who contracted swine flu would die and around one in ten considered that they, their family or the general population had a high or very high chance of contracting the disease.

In conclusion, Professor Lau, says that from the results "it seems that free or low cost vaccination needs to be provided to achieve a high rate of vaccination against A/H1N1. More importantly, the general public has to be convinced about the vaccine's efficacy and safety as misconceptions may exist about what the scientific data show."

Miami Herald: Some health screenings may do more harm than good

Some health screenings may do more harm than good


 

Just excess radiation, one doctor says.
Just excess radiation, one doctor says.

Common diagnostic screenings
STRESS TEST
• For women older than 50 and men older than 40 embarking on a strenuous exercise program. Also for those with shortness of breath or chest pain.

BLOOD TESTS
High sensitivity-C-reactive protein -- indicates inflammation of the arteries.
Lp(a) -- for those with a strong family history of early cardiovascular disease.
ApoB -- to help evaluate risk of cardiovascular disease. Dr. Arthur Agatston recommends it when the total triglycerides are high and the HDL (good cholesterol) is low.
PSA -- the American Urological Association says it should be offered to men 40 or older who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years; others suggest a baseline screening at 50. Not for men over 75. Early findings in two screening studies had conflicting results: a European study found it cut the death rate by 20 percent; an American study found no benefit.

GENETIC TESTS
ApoE -- indicates genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. For those who are concerned about or have a family history of the memory disorder.
Parkin and lark2 -- mutations in these genes indicate a risk for Parkinson's disease. Geneticist Jeffery Vance suggests that those with a strong family history, where multiple generations had Parkinson's, should ask their doctor about these genetic tests.

DIAGNOSTIC SCANS
Mammograms -- to detect breast cancer in women, baseline test at age 40, then annually. Not recommended for younger women because their breast tissue is too dense and breast cancer is relatively rare in that age group. After age 70, at discretion of the patient and her doctor.
... Tests can tell if we have a high risk of prostate cancer, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease and various genetic disorders. CT scans can examine every inch of our bodies.

Are all these tests wise for a healthy adult? While mammograms and blood pressure readings have become part of annual checkups for most Americans, the explosion in preventative health exams has triggered a debate over which tests are necessary and which ones simply drive up the cost of health care -- or actually harm a patient.

Some doctors warn that certain screenings may do more harm than good because they expose the body to unnecessary radiation or raise questions that lead to further, invasive probing. Research suggests that some CT scans increase the risk of radiation-induced cancer.

"There are [genetic] tests that could be run on all of us,'' says Dr. Jeffery M. Vance, chairman of the University of Miami's Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Medical Genetics. But "you need to understand why you're doing it. Make sure it's answering the question you want answered.''
CT scans are "being used for all sorts of diagnostic purposes not envisioned in the past, such as detecting heart disease, [conducting] virtual colonoscopies,'' says Dr. Jeffrey Neitlich, chairman of the Department of Radiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center.

"Patients shouldn't be scared away from CT scans if they need them, but shouldn't have them routinely.''

A study in the August New England Journal of Medicine suggests that as many as 4 million Americans a year are exposed to high doses of radiation from diagnostic scans, with a nuclear heart stress test called the myocardial perfusion scan being the single biggest contributor.

TOTAL-BODY SCANS
Particularly worrisome to Neitlich are full-body scans on healthy people. There has been ``no scientific publication demonstrating that a whole-body CT scan has any impact on life expectancy or quality of life. Therefore, at least at the current time, it's just excess radiation without any proven benefit,'' he says.

While cancer screenings are often life-saving, not all the information is helpful. Among the possible drawbacks, according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force:
• Results that falsely indicate cancer, leading to additional tests and worry.
• Failure to find an existing cancer so that the patient ignores symptoms while the disease continues unchecked.
• Detecting slow-growing or non-fatal cancers, leading to treatment that could have been avoided.

PROSTATE CANCER
The American Cancer Society no longer recommends routine PSA blood tests, saying doctors and patients should discuss the implications first.
"Some prostate cancers grow so slowly that they would likely never cause problems. Because of an elevated PSA level, some men may be diagnosed with a prostate cancer that . . . would never have caused any symptoms or lead to their death,'' the ACS writes in its online screening guide.

HEART TESTS
There's disagreement about which tests should be given. Dr. Michael Ozner, director of Wellness and Prevention for Baptist Health South Florida, recommends three blood tests that include the ApoB ("predictive of who's going to have a heart attack'') and the LP(a), which can help detect heart and vascular disease.

But South Beach Diet doctor Arthur Agatston, an associate professor at UM's medical school, recommends the ApoB only ``if the total tri-glycerides are high and the HDL [good cholesterol] is low.'' He also uses advanced blood tests, CT scans and even genetic tests.

Dr. Melissa Tracy, head of UM's cardiac rehab, would try other treatments before ordering the ApoB or the Lp(a).
"For the average person, we don't have evidence-based medicine that treating an elevated ApoB or Lp(a) leads to a positive outcome,'' she says.

Ozner's third recommendation is the high-sensitivity CRP blood test, to tell "whether arteries are inflamed,'' Studies have shown that people with elevated CRP levels and normal cholesterol were at increased risk of a heart attack, he says.

"In the past we've treated cardiovascular disease like a plumbing problem,'' Ozner says. "Now we know it's not a cholesterol storage disease, but a chronic inflammation disease. We have three tests that are very important to uncover hidden risks, yet people are bombarded with ads to get 64-slice CT scans.''

Ozner, whose book The Great American Heart Hoax: Lifesaving Advice Your Doctor Should Tell You About Heart Disease Prevention (But Probably Never Will) was published last year, calls the 64-slice heart CT scan for healthy people ``one of the biggest hoaxes perpetuated on the public.

"All that does is gives the patient an inordinate amount of radiation and sends people down the slippery slope to more and more medical intervention,'' he says. "If you're a man or woman in the ER with the proverbial elephant on your chest, I'm all for CT scans'' and other interventions.

A recent study found the median level of radiation in a heart CT scan is equal to 600 chest X-rays, although the levels varied widely.

"There are a lot of different ways to do cardiac CT scans. You can take two different centers and get twice the radiation at one as at the other,'' says Mount Sinai's Neitlich.

ALZHEIMER'S
As for Alzheimer's disease, many diagnostic tools are in the works. The ApoE gene test is already available.

Vance warns against genetic testing by mail, partly because some of the factors detected by these tests raise alarms when the risk really isn't that high.

"The results are misleading,'' Vance says. "It's important to have it done with a genetic counselor or a doctor to discuss what it means . . . Other than the very rare mutation, there is no test that's going to tell you 100 percent that you'll get Alzheimer's.''

----------------ooooooooooo000000000000oooooooooo-----------------------

Screening for Prostate and Breast Cancers

Have the benefits been overstated?
Screening for prostate and breast cancers has been promoted heavily in the U.S., and annual screening costs are US$20 billion for just these two cancers. 

Lifetime diagnoses of prostate cancer were made in 1 of 11 white men in 1980; in 2009, the risk is 1 in 6. 

For breast cancer, risks were 1 in 12 in 1980 and 1 in 8 in 2009. 

Authors of a highly publicized JAMA review now challenge the value of such intensive screening.

If screening accurately identifies cancer at an early treatable stage, the incidence of localized cancer should increase after screening is implemented, and the incidence of metastatic cancer should decline. Because this pattern has occurred for neither breast nor prostate cancer, screening simply might identify low-risk non–life-threatening cancers that then are treated inappropriately with aggressive therapy. 

By comparison, screening for colon and cervical cancers has led to significantly fewer cases of advanced disease. The observed decline in prostate cancer–related mortality in the last 20 years probably is not attributable to screening but, rather, to aggressive new adjuvant therapies.
The costs associated with screening are substantial. 

For breast cancer, avoiding 1 cancer-related death requires annual screening of more than 800 women (age range, 50–70) for 6 years, which generates hundreds of biopsies and overly aggressive treatment for many patients with low-grade cancers.

The authors recommend greater focus on identifying new biomarkers that differentiate low- and high-risk cancers, minimalist approaches that are appropriate for treating patients with low-risk cancers, better tools to guide physicians and patients in informed decision making, and a greater focus on prevention and screening in high-risk patients rather than broad indiscriminate screening.

Thomas L. Schwenk, MD
Published in Journal Watch General Medicine October 29, 2009
Reference: Esserman L et al. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 2009 Oct 21; 302:1685.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Med J Australia: The decline of clinical contact in medicine

Bill Lancashire, Craig T Hore and Robert G Fassett
MJA 2009; 191 (9): 508-510

Abstract


  • Patient contact with medical students and clinicians may be on the decline.


  • Increasing medical graduate numbers, workforce and training demands, and the institution of safe working hours are putting pressure on opportunities for direct clinical interaction.


  • Medical education curricula and clinical postgraduate education supervisors must ensure that students and junior doctors recognise the importance of hands-on clinical contact with patients.


  • Although many new developments aid health care efficiencies and can assist with the complexities of care required in a modern hospital, clinicians need to maintain their focus on the patient.

    -----------------ooooooooo0000000000000ooooooooooo-------------------------
    My Comments:
    Declining soft therapeutic skills, lost art of the Clinical Encounter
    Another recent commentary from the Medical Journal of Australia, which decries the gradual but steady decline in doctor-patient contact, an erosion of the clinical learning experience, a diminishing of the special doctor-patient encounter and relationship.


    It's time to focus back on the patient and enhance and enrich that unique relationship--that clinical contact which would make us less dependent on technology and lessen the aloofness which some patients are complaining about more and more. Many are finding the so-called modern encounter too rushed,  too brief and too impersonal. This may be driving some patients away to alternative therapies which somehow emphasise more personal and empathetic outreach...


    We must learn to rekindle this clinical skill and recognise its importance!

Budget 2010: What’s in it for Health Care?

This has been published in Malaysian Insider 1 Nov 2009
A slightly briefer version was published in Malaysiakini 2 Nov 2009
Another full version is published as Analysis in MalaysianMirror 4 Nov 2009


Budget 2010: What’s in it for Health Care?
Dr David KL Quek, drquek@gmail.com, President, MMA


YAB Dato’ Sri Najib Razak’s maiden national budget 2010 must at first glance appear people-centric, but on closer scrutiny, the goodies appear much less than expected and generalities abound rather than specifics.

Still, the Prime Minister must be credited for at least trying to reduce the national fiscal deficit from a high of 7.4% in 2009 to 5.6% for 2010.

The overall national expenditure has been reduced by 11.2% from RM215.7 billion to RM 191.5 billion. Operating expenditure has also been cut to just RM138.3 billion, but still consumes 72.2% of the entire budget. The rest of RM53.2 billion or 27.8% is earmarked for Development Expenditure.

What is more worrisome is that the projected federal revenue in 2010 is expected to decline 8.4% to RM148.4 billion compared with RM162.1 billion in 2009. From an expected recession of 3.5% negative growth ending this year 2009, growth is expected in 2010, at a modest positive rate of 2 to 3 per cent.

Budget 2010 and Health

What is there in the Budget 2010 for Health Care?

Well, most health economists and pundits including the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) have always been advocating for a larger allocation of the national budget for health care services. Over the past 5 years, health care expenditure has been prudently but perhaps frugally low between 3.6 to 4.9% of the GDP, which many consider as being too inadequate.

Yet despite this rather low spending, over the past many years, Malaysia must be commended for having done relatively well in providing better than expected health care outcomes and importantly relatively high quality medical services. Our human development index has been above average for many years, although obviously laggard behind our more prosperous Asia Pacific front liners.

Yes, many detractors may grouse that perhaps we could have done better, and they would be right. Nearly every health system in the world could have performed better and more efficiently. But in practical terms, if we were to consider how much we actually spend on health care thus far, we have indeed done well in terms of productivity computations—the so-called better bang for the buck.

But because Malaysians are now expecting so much more in terms of better quality standards and timeliness of care, there has to be greater commitment and investment in our health care system, so that we are up to mark and comparable to the more developed nations, or even to be at par with neighbouring Singapore.

Malaysian Medicine can become better, if we show greater commitment to improvements and excellence of standards in both health care providers, supporting staff and properly trained use of amenities already in place in most of our hospitals and medical facilities nationwide.

There must be a greater commitment to retain and reward excellent performers, so that their talents and skills remain within the nation and preferably within the very well-funded institutions and academic centres. Our medical research should be raised several notches to showcase our serious intent into becoming a world-class deliverer of excellence!

We should remove that all-too-common tendency of many brilliant scientists and doctors to leave our public institutions because of financial concerns, petty local politics, glass ceilings and administrative interference. We must build and sustain a culture of excellence and steadfastly protect these cloistered if egg-shelled veneered institutions.

For 2010, the health care spending has been projected and bumped up to 7.0% of the developmental budget of RM 51.22 billion, i.e. an expenditure of RM3.594 billion, from last year’s RM2.6 billion (4.9%). But, the overall health care operating expenditure is projected to be RM 11.189 billion for 2010, compared with RM 11.753 billion in 2009, a decrease of 4.8%.

Our National Health Accounts give a slightly different perspective

However, if we look at our National Health Accounts (Dr Zailan Hj Adnan, Laporan Perbelanjaan Kesihatan Negara 2008, KKM Oct 5, 2009), Malaysian per capita spending on health rose steadily nearly four-fold from RM 381 in 1997 to RM 1268 in 2008.

In 2008, our computed nominal total health care expenditure was RM 35.1 billion out of a total GDP of RM 740.7 billion, some 4.7% (close enough to the Budget’s estimate of 4.9%).

Although the government spent some estimated RM 13 billion, the other major components of spending came from: other corporations (RM 4.8 billion), private insurance (RM 2.97 billion), other federal agencies (RM 1.6 billion), Ministry of Education (RM 1.05 billion), other agencies (RM 0.9 billion), but largely from out-of-pocket (OOP) private households (RM10.8 billion). Overall, the ‘public’ to private sector spending ratio is 46% and 54% respectively.

Earlier in our discussions with the Ministry of Health officials, there were plans that the government would be willing to push health care spending to reach 7.0% of the GDP in 2010. But this would mean that health care spending should reach some RM 70 billion [out of our total projected GDP (2010) of RM 1.026 trillion!] Does this seem plausible that within 2 years, our healthcare spending is projected to double from that of the year 2008?

Where’s the Extra Funding coming from?

Where is the extra funding coming from, since the government is coming out with only less than RM 12 billion?

Would this projected shortfall of RM 58 billion (of the RM 70 billion) be taken up by the other government-linked agencies and the private sector? This does not seem possible. Unfortunately Najib’s Budget 2010 does not offer any light on this. Since overall there is a determined reduction in government spending and budget, it is unlikely that we can harness such a growth in our healthcare service industry for the coming year.

Although, the general tone of the Budget 2010 is one that encourages private sector investment and spending growth, for the health sector this may not be obvious. The private sector has been expected to take up the slack in this push for greater health care expenditure, but this would depend largely on the economic recovery, which is by most economic predictions going to be ‘L’ shape rather than ‘V’ shape; which means a slow and gradual drawn-out trend rather than an upsurge!

Nevertheless, this 2010 budget on health care is a better commitment than what the MMA had earlier lobbied for. And we hope the private sector is given sufficient impetus and incentive to invest more and generate greater, if not more cost-effective, spending. Perhaps, these can be made more evident as we grapple with and fine tune the implications of the new budget.

Public Access should not be compromised

More importantly, the public and the less well of, should not be shortchanged when it comes to access to health care. Cutting back on public health care spending may adversely affect the quality and delivery of health care service, especially those who have limited options or capacity to choose.

In hard times, most people would on reflex cut back on allocating for health care expenses, and thus may suffer consequences of neglect, noncompliance and delayed treatment. Overall health status for some people can become adversely affected.

However, our public must be educated that better and more prompt access to health care, demands that they too should plan and budget more realistically, i.e. they must be more willing to pay a greater share for higher quality service. Health care especially during retirement years must be adequately budgeted 
for. We must all conscientiously plan for it!

It is increasingly clear that our government, our pensions, our public sector healthcare service cannot indefinitely continue to offer on demand, unrestrained superlative and quickest care for all. It’s simply just not possible.

Healthcare costs unfortunately, will always soar outside the realm of normal economic constraints, because life extending measures and new discoveries will almost always outstrip our abilities to pay for these, especially if modern cutting edge tests and therapies are to be expected and demanded by everyone! Escalating health costs will remain an infinite limitless demand that most finite resources or public purses can never hope to match.

Of course, a single payer national health service type insurance mechanism is probably best, but this remains on the drawing board due to uncertain public and practical concerns. In the interim, our citizens must engage in greater self-preventive and health promotive measures to help reduce unhealthy lifestyle risks. They must be encouraged to take up health insurance earlier and with wider coverage.

To encourage this uptake further, our insurance agencies must improve their operating standards. They must be made more accountable that they cannot always be looking at the bottom line to limit or to deny access. They must strive to be more all inclusive, without being meticulously dismissive—no exhaustive pre-existing conditions should be excluded which ultimately defeats the community coverage goals of health insurances.

We now have around 40% of our population who may have hypertension, and another nearly 15% who have diabetes. Does this mean that nearly 50% of our population be excluded from insurance cover, when they clearly need it most? The insurance industry must devise a better actuarial means testing to widen its possible scope of coverage for our citizens.

We note that for overall insurance contribution, there has been some additional tax rebate/incentive in the budget 2010. But this appears smaller than expected to boost much uptake. For the individual this is quite marginal, and the benefit may not be immediately realised. Besides, there is a run-in lag phase even if one now agrees to take on newer health insurance, but it’s a start to encourage more to invest in their own health planning for the future.

Medical & Health Tourism, not at or citizens’ expense

In many recent private-public workshops and seminars, there is an unprecedented belief that medical/health tourism is the way to go, to help create a new dimension for economic growth in the service industry.

Yet the reality is that this is unlikely to become a major contribution to the nation’s coffers for foreign exchange earnings. As of 2008, only some RM 300 million has been earned from foreign patients. It has been projected that perhaps by 2015, medical tourism dollars would reach RM 2 billion. But this will still only be a small fraction of our GDP.

This cannot be used as a benchmark, an alternative key performance indicator or an ego-boosting, chest-beating symbol, of having come of age! Being a preferred destination for ‘cheaper’ medical treatment, does not necessarily mean and certainly does not imply that our health care system has attained the standards of the first world.

It simply means that in some of our private health care settings, some of our selected medical disciplines are sufficiently good enough to be recognized as suitable, perhaps comparable and safe, and most importantly cost-effective choices for foreign patients.

It actually means that health care costs in some countries have escalated to such astronomical levels that many people could not afford the necessary care at home! Of course, among some of our neighbouring countries, we may attract foreign patients because our level of care has been considered as superior to their own.

More importantly, there are already grouses among many civil groups that despite this push to attract more patients through medical tourism measures, Malaysia has not yet been able to commit to a declaration to provide universal access to health care for all our citizens!

When we hear of almost daily requests for financial assistance for some tertiary (unaffordable and costly) therapies from our own citizens, this seems to run counter to our sense of equity and fair play, when on the other hand, we offer prompt access to aliens/outsiders who can offer a few dollars more!

So what about this further move to encourage greater medical tourism?

To further promote the medical tourism industry, the Government will enhance tax incentives for healthcare service providers who offer services to foreign health tourists. Currently, it is not generally known that there is an incentive for income tax exemption of 50% on the value of these ‘increased exports’. Most doctors are not really aware as to the exact mechanisms of tax rebates under such circumstances.

However, with this new Budget 2010, this rebate will be increased to 100%, to encourage private hospitals and health care facilities to promote their services more aggressively overseas. Thus, essentially all earnings from foreign health tourists will be tax exempt.

We are not too sure if this extends to earnings from the professional aspects/fees of individual doctors and specialists. This incentive is expected to enable healthcare service providers to offer high quality health services, to continually be raising standards and to promote more assertively overseas to attract greater numbers of health tourists. Perhaps, we may succeed yet.

1Malaysia Clinics: Expanding Public Health Facilities

The purported aim of these 1Malaysia clinics is that our government cares about the well being of the rakyat. In fact, a sum of RM14.8 billion (Is this a typo? Because this huge amount is larger than the entire operating expenditure budget for health care services in Budget 2010!) is allocated to manage, build and upgrade hospitals and clinics, although where this money is coming from is not clear as of now.


Apparently, in 2010, hospitals under construction and being upgraded include those in Kluang, Bera, Shah Alam, Alor Gajah and Tampoi.

In addition, we are informed that the EPU is the main driver for urging the government will expand these community clinic services, to be known as 1Malaysia Clinic in urban areas, similar to clinics in rural areas. For a start, RM10 million will be provided to establish 50 clinics in selected areas.

These clinics are to be located in rented shopping lots of housing areas to enable the local community to seek basic health treatments such as fever, cough and flu. What is disturbing is the stated suggestion that these clinics will be manned by medical assistants.
One would have thought that this model is a relic of the past!

There have been some global trends toward professional task shifting, now increasingly contemplated and advocated worldwide following WHO initiatives to reach out to very poor countries, which lack properly trained medical personnel.

This essentially means that so-called ‘simpler’ healthcare responsibilities would be shifted down to lesser (more specifically and focussed) trained, cheaper to maintain personnel e.g. nurse physicians, medical assistants, pharmacist assistants, etc.

In the pre-1980s, it is true that we had utilized medical assistants and ‘jururawat desa’ to help out in more remote rural clinics. They certainly provided a great much needed service then. But, these are now increasingly scaled down so that doctors can oversee more and more of these services to enhance greater quality and service even to our rural or more remote locales. Times have changed, and we are now more than advanced in our development of our personnel and health care providers including doctors.

Therefore, MMA has immediately opposed what we feel is a hugely retrogressive approach to health care. We are saddened that this approach had been suddenly sprung upon us. We understand that sometimes ‘pork-barrel’ goodies need to be dished out, but we envision these so-called ‘1Malaysia clinics’ as simply exercises to exude political goodwill, which can backfire.

This may temporarily salve some very poor urbanites, but we fear that in the longer term, this exercise may be shortchanging the less discerning marginalized public. Regulatory and medico-legal aspects, potential medication or medical leave abuses, and possible unethical practices remain to be ironed out.

However, we have counter-offered that our already very available and plentiful GP clinics be tapped to help provide these outsourced MOH initiatives, as more suitable alternatives. We are made to understand that the Minister of Health sympathises with us in this, although it would appear that the MOH has to contend with other Cabinet portfolios for ‘public service’ projects and financial resources…

For our country, which continues to produce so many new doctors—some 2500 per annum, this will be catastrophic for our younger medical graduates, who might in future not have enough jobs to function, whose livelihood might be threatened, and whose remuneration might be sharply reduced.

We need to enlighten the government that this may not be the best approach. Standards of health care cannot be compromised or made expedient just to accommodate to some economic or short-term considerations.

Conclusions

Thus overall, the Budget 2010 for health care has been more of noise than substance, and is quite disappointing, with a few shocks and regressive suggestions which are at best impractical, but at worst even contradictory, to our existing system and regulations.

We urge the government and the MOH to help resolve some of these incongruities by tapping, perhaps integrating, existing services such as urban private GP clinics, and engage and enhance greater public-private partnerships.

We must move towards better and a more consistent maintenance culture for our existing health facilities and management so that they function at tip top, zero-defect efficiency, with enhanced quality and safety, supported and manned by adequately trained personnel and physicians.

Saturday, October 31, 2009

CDC: 2009 H1N1 Flu: Situation Update 30 October 2009

2009 H1N1 Flu: Situation Update

October 30, 2009, 1:30 PM ET

Key Flu Indicators

October 30, 2009, 1:30 PM
Each week CDC analyzes information about influenza disease activity in the United States and publishes findings of key flu indicators in a report called FluView. During the week of October 18-24, 2009, a review of the key indictors found that influenza activity continued to increase in the United States from the previous week. Below is a summary of the most recent key indicators:
  • Visits to doctors for influenza-like illness (ILI) increased steeply since last week in the United States, and overall, are much higher than what is expected for this time of the year. ILI activity now is higher than what is seen during the peak of many regular flu seasons.
  •  
  • Total influenza hospitalization rates for laboratory-confirmed flu are climbing and are higher than expected for this time of year. Hospitalization rates continue to be highest is younger populations with the highest hospitalization rate reported in children 0-4 years old. 
  •  
  • The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) based on the 122 Cities Report has increased and has been higher than what is expected at this time of year for four weeks now. In addition, 22 flu-related pediatric deaths were reported this week; 19 of these deaths were confirmed 2009 H1N1, and three were influenza A viruses, but were not subtyped. Since April 2009, CDC has received reports of 114 laboratory-confirmed pediatric 2009 H1N1 deaths and another 12 pediatric deaths that were laboratory confirmed as influenza, but where the flu virus subtype was not determined.
  •  
  • Forty-eight states are reporting widespread influenza activity at this time. They are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. This many reports of widespread activity are unprecedented during seasonal flu.
  •  
  • Almost all of the influenza viruses identified so far are 2009 H1N1 influenza A viruses. These viruses remain similar to the virus chosen for the 2009 H1N1 vaccine, and remain susceptible to the antiviral drugs oseltamivir and zanamivir with rare exception.

Dr Rahul Parikh: Health Reform Should Be About More Than Money

Health Reform Should Be About More Than Money

Dr Rahul K. Parikh
OCTOBER 7, 2009 10:00AM

There is plenty to criticize in our bungling trek toward health reform.  Leaders on the right, left and at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue  have sidestepped the crucial conversation of controlling the cost of care, in favor of partisan rhetoric about "death panels" and  "rationing care."  Worse, the entire focus of reform has centered on spending billions of dollars on technology solutions that will only make marginal changes in the cost and quality of care Americans get.

I want to refocus the debate on what matters most: relationships.  Let's reinvest in the sitting down with, listening to, empathizing with and touching patients.

America has the most advanced healthcare system in the world. But in our haste to research, develop and invest in high-tech medicine, we have lost sight of the very basics of good doctoring. The first things we learn in medical school are: ask, listen and touch. Doctors do not do enough of this any more.

As has been made painfully clear, most doctors are rewarded for doing all manner of procedures.  This is true from the earliest moments of our career. As a resident, even when faced with the most basic medical problems,  I was grilled by my attending when I didn't order the full battery of tests, or contact all the specialists available to consult on a patient. Thus, over-testing and over-treating becomes a knee-jerk response from the get go.

This is how doctors practice medicine today. Some of us do it this way because it's how we get paid. Some of us refer our patients to specialists because we don't have time to sit down with them ourselves. Some of us rely on tests and procedures because we're fearful of malpractice lawsuits. And most of us have just lost sight of the most powerful tools in the doctor's arsenal: our hands and our minds.

I'll illustrate this with an example. Once while still a medical student, author Dr. Sandeep Jauhar evaluated a man with chest pain whose lab tests and EKG suggested he was having a heart attack. The patient was admitted to the ICU. Hours later, the patient was in severe pain and his blood pressure had dropped. The resident in charge ordered another EKG and prepared to intubate and place a central line in the patient.

In the midst of this, Jauhar took the patient's blood pressure. For reasons then unclear to him, the resident instructed Jauhar to repeat the exercise -- on the patient's other arm. Jauhar tried, but above the din of beeping monitors and barking doctors, he couldn't hear the pulsing sounds through his stethoscope. Jauhar "shrugged and let it go."

Sometime in the night, the patient underwent a CT scan. The next morning Jauhar learned his patient hadn't suffered a heart attack, after all. Instead, it was an aortic dissection - a tear in the wall of his aorta, leading to severe internal bleeding. Worse, with the time lost to the misdiagnosis, the dissection was now inoperable. The patient died later that day.

I use this example because the diagnosis ultimately confirmed by a $1,000 high-tech CT scan would have been evident from the low-tech hands-on procedure Jauhar  shrugged-off. A discrepancy in blood pressures between the right and left arm is a classic indicator of aortic dissection, and easily distinguishes the condition from a heart attack.

Consider that a blood pressure cuff costs just a few dollars, compared with the hundreds of thousands of dollars in sophisticated ICU and ER equipment that the medical team employed trying to solve the riddle of the patient's condition. These same high tech tests and procedures also led the medical team down the wrong path. So much for the certainty we believe technology gives us.

If Jauhar had employed the basics of physical exam might the patient have lived? Possibly. In my own recent experience, I saw a young boy whose mother told me he seemed to be clumsier than other children his age. She had mentioned this to previous doctors, as well. When I examined him, I noted very brisk reflexes and an unusual flapping motion in his feet. This is called ankle clonus. I referred the mother to a pediatric neurologist. I learned shortly thereafter that her son wasn't just clumsy. He has cerebral palsy. This is a diagnosis that must be made clinically; oftentimes an MRI or a CT scan cannot detect CP because there are no discrete visible findings. The happy ending is that physical and occupational therapy can ameliorate the boy's symptoms.

My point is that not all of the system's ills can be solved with high technology - nor should they be. If you believe that reforming health care is essential for our country's future - and if you're at all mindful of our fiscal state -- then you've got to be open to other strategies besides throwing billions of dollars at the problem.

We can start by leveraging the basics. For doctors like me, this means re-learning value of the patient history and the head to toe physical exam. It means weaning ourselves off our dependence on technology, tests and procedures.

In a better system, doctors won't be rewarded for doing everything.  Instead, they will be rewarded for doing the right things. They'll use their heads and hands to decide how to spend our healthcare dollars - and I can promise you they'll spend less of them in the process.

This is how we could do it. This is how we should do it. Simply by re-prioritizing medicine's hands-on basics we can make great strides toward improving healthcare, without spending a dime on more technology.

--------------oooooooooo0000000000ooooooooooo----------------------
My Comments:
I have been very vocal about this for a long time. In this day and age of high-powered diagnostic tools and advanced technical instruments/skills, our growing dependence on these have crippled our clinical acumen. 

We are giving less and less time to our patients and allowing techniques and technology to replace our professional skills. Partly because, doing more tests or procedures means more reimbursement, so that we cannot be truly objective about our conflict of interests, our moral hazard. 

Perhaps, it is time to reward good clinical medical practice while saving some costs, and perhaps help reducing the risks and discomfort of some procedures which may be redundant or superfluous...




Breast Cancer
Today, one of my patients who is a  very health conscious woman, returned for her BP review after she had lumpectomy for breast cancer. Her cytochemical HER3 was positive, but oestrogen and progestin markers were negative.


This cancer was discovered on routine mammography about a few weeks ago; she had been faithfully having mammography annually for more than 15 years. Her late mother had breast cancer at 80 years, and she was worried that she could inherit this risk. 


She also had a CT angiogram done at another centre because a friend recommended this, because she was worried about her atypical chest pains. A few years ago she had a total body CT scan, again for health screening purposes--found some cervical and lumbo-sacral spondylosis, which made her nearly worried to death about her possible limp and neck/back ache. 

Since menopause, she was on hormone replacement therapy for 5 years, stopped for a year or two and then restarted on MHT/HRT for a further few years, only to stop when she developed hypertension about 4 years ago. She is now just 66 years old. Now she is contemplating further chemotherapy...


I just wonder if her breast cancer could have been the result of all her radiological exposure (MSCT thorax has been calculated to increase cancer risk in women in some recent studies), her hormone replacement therapy (WHI, NEJM), her stress levels, a multiplicity of risk factors, just enough to tweak her small genetic risk a little to manifest earlier, as potential co-carcinogens. I wonder...

Perhaps. less done might have been less harm...

Friday, October 30, 2009

A New Role for Curry (Tumeric): Cancer Killing!

Curries knock cancer dead Print E-mail


Malaysian Mirror, Friday, 30 October 2009 17:23


LONDON - Curries are good in more ways than one. curry.jpg


Cancer researchers are now saying that a substance found in the curry spice tumeric can kill cancer cells within 24 hours.

Scientists based at the Cork Cancer Research Centre treated oesophageal cancer cells with curcumin – a chemical found in the tumeric.

The researchers discovered that curcumin triggered lethal death signals in the cancer cells, killing them within a day. The cells also began to digest themselves and die.

The results of the study were published in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday.


Dr Sharon McKenna, the lead researcher, said the results might mean curcumin could be developed as an anti-cancer drug to treat oesophageal cancer.

Curcumin is what gives turmeric, which is related to ginger, its orangy-yellow colour.
Traditional medical practioners have long used turmeric to treat ailments as it has anti-inflammatory and anti-fungal properties and is said to lower cholestrol.

According to Cancer Research UK,  oesophageal cancer rates have gone up by more than a half since the 70s and this was thought to be linked to rising rates of obesity, alcohol intake and reflux disease.
It kills more than half a million people in the world each year and it is exceptionally deadly, with five-year survival rates of between 12% and 31%.

Singapore: H1N1 jabs at $29 each

H1N1 jabs at $29 each

Straits Times, 29 October 2009
By Judith Tan & Jessica Jaganathan
















The vaccine is available only to adults over 18 and will cost $29 per jab.

A SHOT of the H1N1 vaccine will cost $29 at the 18 polyclinics islandwide when it arrives in Singapore in about a week.

And for now, it is available only to adults over 18, as it is still being tested on children.

The price was agreed upon by the two health-care clusters, Singapore Health Services (SingHealth) and National Healthcare Group (NHG), to make the vaccine affordable to everyone.

SingHealth Polyclinics chief executive officer Tan Chee Beng said yesterday: 'At $29 nett at the polyclinics, the cost of the H1N1 vaccination is much lower than Tamiflu. It is a cost effective shield against H1N1.'

The antiviral drug Tamiflu can cost a patient between $45 and $70.

Private clinics said they were still awaiting word from the Health Ministry on pricing but would probably charge $30 to $32 for the shots.

------------------oooooooooo0000000000oooooooooo--------------------


It's interesting that Malaysia could just order and obtain 400,000 A/H1N1 flu shots, whereas for Singapore, the MOH has imported sufficient vaccines to offer to their citizens albeit by charging nearly at cost to all who wish to be vaccinated. It baffles me how they are able to book so much vaccine doses despite the global shortage, so that it is confident of offering the vaccine to all its population for now over the age of 18 years...

Monday, October 26, 2009

MMA: Treading between Advocacy & Professional Balance


MMA: Treading between Advocacy & Professional Balance


President's Page, MMA News, October 2009



“There is no career nobler than that of the physician.  The progress and welfare of society is more intimately bound up with the prevailing tone and influence of the medical profession than with the status of any other class...” ~ Elizabeth Blackwell, M.D., 1889



Medical Professionalism and our Caring Vocation
As medical professionals, our patients should be our raison d’être, our sine qua non for existing.

However, as is becoming more evident, daily societal developments pose severe challenges to our medical profession. Our role as physicians sometimes appears to come into conflict or competition with society’s other demands—some social, while others, political.

Yet, we must choose a careful path, treading a thin line between strident but necessary advocacy and rational professional balance on the other. Above all, we must remain steadfast as our patients’ strongest advocate—their health interests must precede all others. 

During the start of my term of office, I had highlighted that I would emphasise the more humane aspects of the medical professional, that kindlier face of the doctor as we interact daily with our patients. As physicians, we must strive to always practice our craft without that edgy touch of cynicism, jadedness and/or burnout.

We must project that long-forgotten intimate encounter which makes us the most trusted and respected amongst professionals. We must re-ignite that fervour to make this a daily reality for our patients and all those whom we connect with through all walks of life.

But this must be through one’s personal conscious effort—it does not come naturally to most of us… The good thing is that we can learn and adapt until this becomes a part of our attitude, our persona.

My personal daily goal is to see if I could get each and every one of my patients to leave my consultation room with a contented smile; yes, despite the fees, the test results and burden of illness. The hospitalized patient poses a rather more difficult problem—many are too ill or too discomfited to be satisfied, but he or she can usually be consoled, especially when we show that we care. And most patients can actually sense our sincerity and our empathy.


But this is by no means a given. We all have our off-days, days when we are troubled by our own unresolved nagging tribulations and private burdens. Just to shake off these deep-rooted weights would make most of us sullen, poorly communicative people, who would not normally be expected to make good counsellors or empathetic muses!


Yet, that is expected of us, to perform even in the midst of personal distress and overbearing internal conflicts. I have striven to do this for some years now, but sometimes this just isn’t possible. Undoubtedly, this will increase our stress level which is now recognized even by our own citizens! In a recent poll, Malaysians had voted doctors as the second most stressful job among the professions, the PM's position being the one to beat!












How do we inform seriously ill patients that their ailment is life threatening, or even terminal? How do we get the patients and their loved ones to come to grips with the dire prognoses, the possible huge treatment costs, and the uncertain outcomes for some illness? How do we sometimes admit our limitations that even we do not have all the answers?

Yet on the more mundane aspects, how do we continue to inculcate a sense of shared intervention and commitment to some therapeutic regimen for some chronic ailments such as hypertension, diabetes, etc.? We need to constantly urge even ‘gently berate’ our patients to stay on treatment for the best outcomes in the long term, especially when the symptoms are covert, apparently nonexistent, or even silent?

As doctors, we must regularly remind ourselves that among the professions, we are perhaps the only one that demands a caring value system. We must constantly remind ourselves of this duty.



Yet again there are other issues, which demand our action and our input, at least this is what I have pledged to do. There are problems with some of our health care services such as our forensic service, which has been under the spotlight recently.

Careless and callous attention to detail has created great public uncertainty, dismay and disbelief, which undermines the critical function of our forensic pathology services. The MMA naturally would stress that forensic health care is every bit as essential for the final truth and professional determination of causation of death or injury, especially of anyone under detention—as is demanded of us the medical professional, in WMA’s Declarations of Tokyo and Istanbul.
 




Let us practice the noble art of medicine as has been enjoined upon us from time immemorial.  Let us engage more meaningfully and help shape the kind of medical practice that we would all be proud of. 

Ongoing Challenges
Just 4 months into the fiscal year, and the MMA continues to face new or resurgent challenges. Some of these are simply perennial issues, which surface periodically when political awakenings rekindle them into topical issues of importance of the day. Others are the result of unforeseen or poorly planned policies that have now come home to roost with outcomes that seriously impact our profession and our practice.

1. Competition is becoming more intense than ever. We continue to have complaints of community pharmacies posing as clinics, providing discounted medicines to unsuspecting patients who have elected to purchase their medications without prescription. This continues to take place, despite MMA’s consistently vocal stance that safety issues and laws have been breached.

We also have the understanding from the Malaysian Pharmaceutical Society that it is trying hard to rein in their pharmacies, their members. But the MPS has also repeatedly called for a greater if total separation of duties—to let each professional earn his/her true value and worth.  The MPS continues to urge that perhaps doctors can start by being a little more transparent in their prescribing and dispensing habits. We are trying to resolve some common interests through greater dialogue, which may benefit both parties as a win-win approach—but we are a long way off a final agreement or compromise.

In most urban centres, there is a glut of side-by-side clinics, thereby causing intense competition for patients both from self-paying patients as well as for panel contracts or even third party payer MCOs, which are demanding depressingly low capitation fees for services.




Latterly, there were reports of some private medical centres/hospitals expanding their coverage with feeder clinics and wellness centres. Undoubtedly, these are patently to recruit more patients for their services, their laboratories and their hospital facilities. 

We have recently sent notice of our displeasure to the press, and urge the authorities to nip these practices in the bud!


 



2. ‘1Malaysia Clinics’ & Task Shifting
There have been some global trends toward professional task shifting, now increasingly contemplated and advocated worldwide following WHO initiatives to reach out to very poor countries, which lack properly trained medical personnel.

This essentially means that so-called ‘simpler’ healthcare responsibilities would be shifted down to lesser (more specifically and focussed) trained, cheaper to maintain personnel e.g. nurse physicians, medical assistants, pharmacist assistants, etc.

And now during the recent Budget 2010, we received yet another shockwave to the equanimity of our urban GPs—the just announced ‘1Malaysia clinics’ to be manned by medical assistants! One would have thought that this model is a relic of the past!

In the pre-1980s, it is true that we had utilized medical assistants and ‘jururawat desa’ to help out in more remote rural clinics. They certainly provided a great much needed service then.

But, these are now increasingly scaled down so that doctors can oversee more and more of these services to enhance greater quality and service even to our rural or more remote locales.

Therefore, MMA has immediately opposed what we feel is a hugely retrogressive approach to health care. We are saddened that this approach had been suddenly sprung upon us. We understand that sometimes ‘pork-barrel’ goodies need to be dished out, but we envision these so-called ‘1Malaysia clinics’ as simply exercises to exude political goodwill. This may temporarily salve some very poor urbanites, but we fear that in the longer term, this exercise may be shortchanging the less discerning marginalized public. Regulatory and medico-legal aspects, potential abuses and unethical practices remain to be ironed out.

However, we have counter-offered that our already very available and plentiful GP clinics be tapped to help provide these outsourced MOH initiatives, as more suitable alternatives. We are made to understand that the Minister of Health sympathises with us in this, although it would appear that the MOH has to contend with other Cabinet portfolios for ‘public service’ projects and financial resources…

For our country, which continues to produce so many new doctors—some 2500 per annum, this will be catastrophic for our younger graduates, who might in future not have enough jobs to function, and whose remuneration may be sharply reduced. We need to enlighten the government that this may not be the best approach. Standards of health care cannot be compromised or made expedient just to accommodate to some economic or short-term considerations.

3. CPD/CME & MSQH Accreditation Standards
Another issue regarding professional standards has also to be resolved. As doctors, we must constantly be upgrading our standard of care and professionalism, as well as our currency of our medical knowledge, i.e. we must keep up with CPD/CME activities.

Our clinics and amenities must be enhanced and modernized in keeping with public expectations, keeping cost-cutting measures at a minimum so as not to jeopardize the public perceptions that GPs are only mercenary and venal, and too profit-orientated!

The Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH) has been set up to help modernize the standards of health care in Malaysia. As a very dynamic entity, it has been working hard to enhance its value by being a lot bolder in its push for more if not all clinics to be accredited as of sufficient quality. This aggressive approach may pose yet another round of regulatory burden on us, the private medical practitioner.

As an initial founding partner, the MMA appears to have been rather silent, in the past. Perhaps to be fair, some of these exercises and progress of the MSQH reach have been hitherto understated, and its potential for burdening the GPs not fully realised. As president just recently exposed to the intricacies of the MSQH exercise, I will work to address such concerns so that doctors will not be subject to any more regulations and new Acts.

Furthermore, we need to work with the Academy of Family Physicians (AFPM) to see if we can re-organise the frame of reference of upgrading and updating our GP/FP practices. At the most, we will accept MSQH as a reference standard purely on a voluntary basis, which should in no way reduce our acceptance with any distribution of work or panels or third party payer contracts or business opportunities.

Most importantly, the MMA needs all your support and members must all come forward to be bold in defending this stand.

Let’s work together to ensure that we provide the best to our patients without overburdening our capacity to cope. Let’s come together to self-regulate and engage in self-improvement techniques, credentialing exercises and standards attainment, which are the hallmarks of mature medical systems the world over.

In this way, we can together persuade the authorities and policy makers that we can be trusted to provide the best and most professional healthcare for all our patients without fear or favour, and certainly not at our professional expense!






Saturday, October 24, 2009

NST: Budget 2010 Healthcare: Urban folk to benefit but private doctors worry

Urban folk to benefit but private doctors worry


NST, Saturday 2009/10/24

KUALA LUMPUR: The government's move to expand community clinics, to be known as 1Malaysia Clinics, in urban areas similar to government clinics in rural areas got the thumbs up from the public and health ministry.

Director-General of Health Tan Sri Dr Ismail Merican said the 1Malaysia Clinics would ensure that the public gets prompt treatment for minor ailments, including wound dressings.

"Although the clinics will be manned by trained paramedics, we will also put in a mechanism for doctors to go on a regular basis to these clinics."

He said the 1Malaysia Clinics would have standard operating procedures to provide not only treatment for minor ailments, but also to handle emergencies and put in place a referral system.

Director-General of Health Tan Sri Dr Ismail Merican says the clinics will ensure prompt treatment of minor ailments

Najib, in his 2010 Budget speech yesterday, said these clinics would be opened in rented shop lots at housing areas for the convenience of the community to seek treatment for fever, cough and flu.

He added that these clinics would be manned by medical assistants and would operate daily from 10am to 10pm.

For a start, an allocation of RM10 million would be provided to establish 50 clinics in selected areas.

Dr Ismail also welcomed the move by the government to allocate RM14.8 billion to manage, build and upgrade hospitals and clinics.

"With the hospitals and clinics upgraded, the rakyat can be assured of better services from doctors who will have a better environment to work in," he said.

Construction and upgrading of hospitals for next year would include those in Kluang, Bera, Shah Alam, Alor Gajah and Tampoi.

However, private general practitioners are worried that the setting up of the 1Malaysia Clinics in urban areas might affect their business.

Malaysian Medical Association president Dr David Quek Kwang Leng said it would definitely affect the income of general practitioners who were already hit by the economic recession, and having to compete with pharmacies.

"We are also worried about the task shifting, namely the medical assistants, being designated for non-critical services.

"It may be cost-effective in the short-term but the ministry must look into its implementation in the long term."

He said every year, some 2,500 doctors would be graduating and joining the employment field and they must be placed in remote and urban areas.

"We are not against the setting up of 1Malaysia Clinics in remote and rural areas. But, there are enough clinics to handle patients in urban areas," said Dr Quek.

Furthermore, he added, the association wondered whether the paramedics were trained well enough to handle patients with minor ailments.

Several people, when contacted, said that they welcomed the 1Malaysia Clinics as they no longer have to queue up at the hospital's outpatient clinics and emergency department for minor ailments.

Businessman S. Francis, 61, said the move was timely especially with many facing financial problems due to the economic crisis.

"There are many people who cannot afford to go to private hospitals and clinics to get treatment for minor ailments," he said.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Malaysian Mirror: Private hospitals breaking the law










Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:16
KUALA LUMPUR – Private hospitals, which initially aimed to provide specialist treatment, are now directly competing with general hospitals in providing ‘outpatient’ treatment.

This, said the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), is a breach of the Private Healthcare facilities and Services (Private Hospitals and Other Private Healthcare Facilities) Regulations 2006.

MMA president Dr David K L Quek quoted a part of the regulations that stated: A private hospital shall not maintain or provide outpatient facility or service, except a specialist facility and service.

He said it had come to the knowledge of the association that a private medical centre had set up a primary care centre (feeder clinic) outside its hospital premises.

“We understand that several others are considering doing the same, as if to test the waters,” he said, adding that the MMA is ‘vehemently’ opposed to such move.

'Do not compete with general practitioners and family doctors'

Dr Quek said private medical centres should just stick to tertiary specialist services and not to compete with primary care physicians; that is, general practitioners and family physicians.

He added that such practices, if left unchecked, would not be consistent with the Private Health Care and Services Act (1998) and Regulations (2006).

Dr Quek said the issue of private hospitals or medical centres running ‘general practice’ type of services is not new.

He said this had been attempted before and some of these hospitals had failed in the wake of complaints by the MMA.

“In our discussions with several ministers (of Health) and other ministry officials, we deemed such practices as anti-competitive, monopolistic and place family physicians and general practitioners at a great disadvantage.

“Therefore, it has been agreed that this should not be allowed, whether in-house or outside, as feeder clinics.”

Dr Quek said feeder clinics, when they are set up, will be directed to only refer their patients to a particular medical centre.

On the other hand, he said, most general practitioners act as ‘gatekeepers’ to refer patients to doctors on a ‘best choice’ basis, dependent on the individual doctor’s experience and knowledge.

“Also, there may be pressures and conflicts of interest if medical officers working in the feeder clinics only refer to specific private medical centres.

The carpenter and his hammer
“Possibly, there may be greater resort to costly laboratory tests or greater over-utilisation of amenities such as CT scanners,” he said.

“We understand that medical centres with huge investments in diagnostic and curative care services have to recruit some of the costs by casting a wider net.

“But this is fraught with other dangers – what some have called ‘misdirected care’ – over the utilization of available resources, inappropriate investigations leading to unnecessary operations or other services; all adding up to extra costs but not necessarily improving the health of the people,” Dr Quek said.

Giving a metaphor to the situation, he said: “The carpenter with a hammer will use it on any nail that he sees; so everything is a nail tohim who has a hammer.”

He urged the Health Ministry to quickly and seriously take urgent actions to curb the unethical practices.

It also urge the Malaysian Medical Council to consider such practices as ‘unethical and tantamount to fee splitting.’ - Malaysian Mirror

Thursday, October 22, 2009

MMA bantah hospital wujud klinik pesakit luar

MMA bantah hospital wujud klinik pesakit luar


Berita Harian 22 Oktober, 2009. KUALA LUMPUR:
Persatuan Perubatan Malaysia (MMA) membantah keputusan pusat perubatan swasta mewujudkan klinik pesakit luar di kawasan hospital mereka kerana ia akan memberi saingan kepada klinik kesihatan swasta.

Presidennya, Dr David Quek Kwang Leng, berkata pusat perubatan swasta sepatutnya menumpukan peranan mereka menyediakan perkhidmatan pakar, bukannya bersaing dengan klinik pesakit luar.

“Sebagai contoh, perkhidmatan pengamal awam dan doktor keluarga akan semakin mengecil sekali gus menjejaskan pendapatan mereka akibat persaingan hebat daripada pusat perubatan swasta.

“Jika perkara ini tidak diteliti dengan baik, ia bertentangan dengan Akta Perkhidmatan dan Kemudahan Penjagaan Kesihatan Swasta (1998) dan Peraturan 2006,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan semalam.

Beliau berkata, isu membabitkan hospital swasta dan pusat perubatan swasta menjalankan jenis perkhidmatan pengamal awam bukan sesuatu yang baru dan sebarang usaha untuk pihak berkenaan berbuat demikian akan mendapat tentangan MMA.

Mengulas lanjut, Dr Quek berkata, jika pusat rawatan asas di luar hospital diwujudkan, klinik berkenaan akan meminta pesakitnya merujuk terus pakar di pusat perubatan berkenaan sehingga menyebabkan pilihan yang terhad kepada pesakit.

“Pada asasnya doktor kesihatan awam akan membantu pesakit merujuk pihak yang bertanggungjawab, bergantung kepada keperluan dan pilihan terbaik selain berpandukan kepada pengalaman doktor terbabit.

“Pesakit juga ditawarkan membuat pilihan untuk menentukan siapa doktor yang mereka mahu untuk keselesaan mereka,” katanya.

Sehubungan itu, beliau menyarankan Kementerian Kesihatan mengambil tindakan serius bagi memastikan usaha untuk pusat perubatan swasta berbuat demikian diatasi.


Hak Cipta Terpelihara 2007 - Berita Harian Sdn. Bhd



ORIGINAL PRESS RELEASE: MMA 1031/18


12 October 2009



To the Press



Private Medical Centres Break the Law by Opening Feeder Primary Care Clinics


It has come to MMA’s attention that a Private Medical Centre is setting up a Primary Care centre/feeder clinic outside its hospital premises. We understand that several others are considering doing the same, as if to test the waters. The MMA is vehemently opposed to such moves!


This is contrary to MMA’s understanding that Private Medical Centres should stick to tertiary specialist services, and not to compete with Primary Care Physicians, i.e. General Practitioners and Family Physicians to further dilute their already meagre services, and worse their livelihood, in the face of extreme competition which has permeated the private healthcare sector. Such practices if left unchecked, would not be consistent with the Private Healthcare Facilities Services Act (1998) and Regulations 2006.


The issue of private hospitals or medical centres running general practice type of services is not new. This has been attempted before and some of these have failed in the wake of complaints by the MMA. In our earlier discussions with several Ministers of Health and the other officers of the Ministry of Health practice division, such practices are deemed as anticompetitive and monopolistic, and place the family physicians/general practitioner at a great disadvantage. Therefore, it has been agreed that this should not be allowed, whether in-house or outside, as feeder clinics.


What’s in it for the public? Why should the public also not agree to this practice?


Once feeder clinics are set up, these clinics are directed to only refer to specialists at a particular medical centre, leaving very limited choices for the individual patient. Such is the moral hazard of feeder clinics, and not simply the justifiable convenience and service availability that has been touted to them.


Most GPs function as active gatekeepers to help resolve which patient to refer and then to whom, usually on the need and ‘best choice’ basis, dependent on the individual doctor’s experience and knowledge. The patient is also given a wider option to choose who he or she prefers, without being constrained by silent processes of ‘convenience’.


Also, there may be real-life pressures and conflict of interests if resident medical officers working in such feeder clinics refer onwards to such private medical centres. Possibly there may be greater resort to more costly laboratory testing or greater over-utilization of already available amenities such as CT scanners, etc. It must be remembered that feeder clinics are set up to contribute directly to specific private hospitals by referring primary care patients there, usually without recourse to other choices. They are not there purely for convenience and service.


Several methods to boost utilisation of amenities that some private hospitals have employed are: Wellness clinics, Health screening exercises or even through their A&E or Emergency Department which function as a one-stop polyclinic manned by non-specialist resident or locum medical officers. While campaigns like discounted Pap smears, mammograms, colonoscopy campaign, may have some public benefits, these should not be used to solely and blatantly solicit and generate patients for their amenities, facilities and their services.


We understand that medical centres with huge investments in diagnostic and curative care services have to recruit some of the costs by casting a wider net. But this is fraught with other dangers, what some have called misdirected care: over-utilisation of available resources, inappropriate investigations leading to unnecessary operations or other services; all adding up to extra costs but not necessarily improving the health of the people. One metaphor that is often used to describe such a scenario is as follows:  the carpenter with a hammer will use it on any nail that he sees, so everything is a nail to him who has a hammer.


MMA believes that the regulation ruling on this is clear, although some may choose to interpret them differently.


Private Healthcare Facilities and Services ( Private Hospitals and other Private Healthcare Facilities) Regulations 2006


Part XXIV Regulation 334.
Standards for specialist Outpatient Facilities and Services
Specialist outpatient facilities and services


334. A private hospital shall not maintain or provide an outpatient facility or service except a specialist facility and service


This should not be happening. The Malaysian Medical Association is saddened and very unhappy that such efforts to disturb the equanimity of primary care physicians have been attempted once again. We urge the MOH and its officials to quickly and seriously take urgent actions to curb these practices. We also urge the Malaysian Medical Council to seriously consider such practices as unethical and tantamount to fee-splitting.


Dr David KL Quek
President
Malaysian Medical Association



Thursday, October 8, 2009

US Areas Hit Hard by Swine Flu in Spring See Little Now--Herd Immunity?



New York Times, Published: October 8, 2009

While concern over the spread of the H1N1 virus sweeps the country, epidemiologists in New York and a few other cities that were awash in swine flu last spring are detecting very little evidence of a resurgence.

Although flu season will not peak until the weather gets cold, in New York, which was the nation’s hardest-hit city, officials say that flu activity is no higher than it normally is at this time of year and that school attendance is normal.

Last week, Dr. Anne Schuchat, the director of immunization at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said, “Most states do have quite a lot of disease right now, and that’s unusual for this time of year.”
But public health officials say there appears to be a pattern of areas that had big outbreaks in the spring, like New York, Boston and Philadelphia, seeing less swine flu now.

New York City health officials now believe that while only 10 percent to 20 percent of New Yorkers were reported ill with flu last spring, as many as 20 percent to 40 percent may have been exposed to the disease and developed immunity that has prevented it from spreading.

Although it is too early to be sure, they said, the high level of immunity may mean that the second wave of swine flu infection ends up being far less extensive than expected.

The immunity theory has gained enough credence that Dr. Thomas A. Farley, New York City’s health commissioner, put it forward at a conference on the national preparations for H1N1 last Friday in New York, led by Kathleen Sebelius, the health and human services secretary, and Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, director of the disease control centers.

“We’re not seeing illness in the city right now,” Dr. Farley said at one session. “We’re seeing essentially no disease transmitted in the city. We had 750,000 to one million sick people last spring. We were the hardest-hit city then. So we have a lot of immune people right now.”

Officials say the conflicting data show the delicate balance public health officials are walking with swine flu. So far it has turned out to be less deadly than it seemed when a pattern of deaths was reported in Mexico last spring.

At the same time, officials fear that it could take a turn for the worse, and they want to maintain a high level of alertness without crying wolf too many times.

Dr. Martin S. Cetron, a flu expert at the disease control agency and the co-author of a 2007 study of how the 1918 flu hit 43 American cities, called the idea that flu is not big now because it was big in the spring “an interesting hypothesis, with biological plausibility,” but said that only the rest of the winter would tell.

“To say, Oh, all of us in New York are immune, we won’t have any more disease and we don’t need to take vaccine, is a dangerous conclusion to draw,” Dr. Cetron said.

New York City public health officials are in fact conducting an extensive immunization campaign, and they agree that it is far too early to draw any final conclusions.

“It’s like Sherlock Holmes looking at the evidence and saying, ‘Hmmm, that’s a plausible solution,’ ” Dr. Don Weiss, an epidemiologist with New York City’s health department, said Wednesday. “This sort of fits with what we’re seeing, but there could be other explanations.”

Still, Dr. Weiss added, “The theory that everybody’s talking about is that maybe because New York had such a bad outbreak in the spring, it won’t be so bad in the fall.”
The amount of immunity in a population, called the herd immunity, “will tell you whether or not you will have an outbreak,” Dr. Weiss said.

For highly infectious diseases, like measles, it is generally accepted that 90 percent to 95 percent of the population has to be immunized to prevent an outbreak, he said.

For flu, a virus that is constantly changing year to year, it is less clear what the herd immunity has to be to prevent a further outbreak, but it may be as little as half, and New York may be very close to that, Dr. Weiss said.

Since September, only about 150 to 250 people a day have been going to New York City emergency rooms complaining of flu-like symptoms, officials said. The presumption in New York and elsewhere is that most flu cases this time of year are swine flu, because it is still early in the year for so-called garden-variety flu.

Attendance in the New York City’s public school system, with just over a million students, was 91 percent Wednesday. Last spring, when the virus was rampant, nearly 60 schools were closed and about 18 percent of students were absent.

In Boston, where an estimated 11 percent of adolescents got swine flu in the spring, public schools and college health services have reported very little flu activity this fall, Dr. Anita Barry, director of the infectious disease bureau of the Boston Public Health Commission, said Wednesday.

But Dr. Barry said she was reluctant to draw any conclusions so early in the season, without taking blood samples to test for immunity.

Seattle, Connecticut and Utah also had lots of swine flu in the spring, but appear to have less now, said Donald R. Olson, research director for the International Society for Disease Surveillance.

Some states, including Georgia, Indiana and North Carolina, had “false waves” of swine flu in the spring, Mr. Olson said, which seemed to have been caused by the “worried well” flocking to hospitals.
“Of the places that had ‘real waves’ last spring,” he said, “none have really taken off.”

Georgia in particular took off when schools reopened in August. In the last week of September, there were 81 hospitalizations and eight deaths from H1N1 in the state, according to the Georgia Department of Community Health, compared with 44 hospitalizations and one death in the three-months from late April through late July.

As of Monday, seven pregnant women were on respirators in Arkansas hospitals, officials said.
“We’re hearing from doctors and clinics across the state that they’re swamped,” said Ann Wright, a spokeswoman for the Arkansas Department of Health.

Since August, about half the children seen in the emergency room at Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock have complained of flu, about double the usual number for this time of year, said Craig H. Gilliam, the hospital’s director of infection control.

Mr. Gilliam said the hospital had a record number of emergency room visits on Sept. 15, which he attributed to the flu.


Jennifer Medina contributed reporting from New York, Robbie Brown from Georgia and Steve Barnes from Arkansas.

H1N1 Update: Seasonal Flu Vaccine Seems to Offer Some Protection Against 2009 H1N1

H1N1 Update: Seasonal Flu Vaccine Seems to Offer Some Protection Against 2009 H1N1
Vaccination against seasonal strains of flu seems to offer some protection against 2009 H1N1 virus, particularly severe infections, according to a retrospective study published online in BMJ.

Researchers examined vaccination status in 60 laboratory-confirmed cases of 2009 H1N1 compared with that in 180 matched controls. All subjects were patients in a respiratory disease hospital in Mexico City during the early months of the pandemic. Cases had been admitted for influenza, and controls were treated for diseases other than influenza or pneumonia.

Cases were less likely than controls to have received the seasonal vaccine (13% vs. 29%). Among the cases, those who'd been vaccinated were less likely to die.

The authors urge caution in interpreting the results, which they say "in no way indicate that seasonal vaccine should replace vaccination against pandemic influenza."




 



Wednesday, October 7, 2009

H1N1 Update: CDC Offers Reassurance on Vaccine Safety and Availability

H1N1 Update: CDC Offers Reassurance on Vaccine Safety and Availability
The CDC addressed fears over 2009 H1N1 vaccine safety and availability at a press briefing Tuesday.

CDC Director Thomas Frieden addressed "three major concerns that people have" — that 2009 H1N1 is "just a mild illness"; that the vaccine may not be safe; and that it's already too late to be vaccinated.

Dr. Frieden countered with a reminder that 2009 H1N1 has killed many people and will likely kill more. Regarding safety, he said that the vaccine is made in the same way and in the same facilities as seasonal vaccines, which have an excellent safety record. And as to the futility of vaccination, he said, we "don't know what the rest of this long flu season is going to hold. We haven't had a flu season like this in at least 50 years."

He added: "We're very confident that there will be plenty of vaccine for everyone who wants to be vaccinated. It won't be available when everyone wants to be vaccinated."


US CDC Weekly 2009 H1N1 Flu Media Briefing

October 06, 2009, 12:00 p.m.
Operator: Welcome and thank you for all standing by.  I would like to remind parties your line is in a listen-only mode until the question and answer mode.  Today's call is being recorded.  If you have any objections you may disconnect at this time.  I'll turn it over to Glen Nowak.

Operator: Thank you for dialing in.  Today's update will be conducted the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Thank you. 

Thomas Frieden: Thanks, Glen.  Thanks for being here.  What  I would like to do is update you where with are with the virus and what we're beginning to see in terms of both of them.  Also to discuss some of the concerns that we have been hearing out in the field about the vaccine in particular.  As of today, influenza is widespread in most of the United States.  We're seeing it continuing to increase in some areas.  We're seeing a slight decrease in some areas.  We note that it's now present throughout the united states.

It's still remains overwhelming H1N1 pandemic influenza and influenza is a tough enemy.  It's unpredictable.  Although there has been a slight decrease nationally and in some areas, in other areas it's still on the upswing.  We wish we could predict the future.  But we can't.  We do know that flu season generally lasts well into may.  So, we've got many, many months ahead of us where we don't know what will happen and we need to take the best steps we can to protect ourselves.

Vaccine efforts are starting.  All states in the U.S. have ordered vaccine.  It's being delivered and each Friday, we'll provide information on the amount of vaccine available to each state and the amount of vaccine each state has ordered.  That's a little complicated, because what we have decided to do is make vaccine available as soon as it comes off the production line.  That means, it's coming available in lots and states learn each day, of additional vaccine available to them.  It's a little bit of a messy process and we expect it to be somewhat bumpy in the first few weeks. 

This is the best way to get the vaccine out and available as soon as it becomes available. This week, the flu vaccine became available in the internasal variety.  Next week, it will become available in the injectable variety.  The first was done yesterday with a priority on health care workers and children as well as people who care for infants. 

Flu mist, only able to be used for people age 2 to 49 and who do not have an underlying health problem.  With the production of this strain, we have cut no corners.  This flu vaccine is made as flu vaccine is made each year.  By the same companies.  In the same production facilities.  With the same procedures.  With the same safety, safeguards. 

We have had literally hundreds of millions of people vaccinated against flu with flu vaccine made in this way.  That enables us to have a high degree of confidence in the safety of the vaccine. It has an excellent safety record.  We wished we had the vaccine earlier.  It would have been great to have had it back in April or May.  But the current science doesn't allow us to produce in much less than six months, and that's what it has taken to produce it at this time. 

People have concerns about vaccination.  People always have concerns about vaccinations and that's understandable.  We would rather not take any shots or medicine and stay healthy. 

The flu vaccination, being tried and true, is very effective.  What we're seeing still is an excellent match between the virus that's spreading throughout the U.S. And the strain that was chosen to make the vaccine against.  So, we expect a very good match a very good degree of efficacy of the vaccine.  It will work to protect you if you get in time. 

Three major concerns that people have, despite the clear message from all of us in public health and doctors throughout the health care field that vaccine is our best tool to protect against the flu. 

Vaccine is the best tool to protect the flu, because, not only does it prevent people from becoming severely ill, it also prevents the spread of flu. 

The first concern that we hear is, oh, flu is just a mild illness.  Actually, on average, flu is not a mild illness.  It can make you pretty sick, knock you out for a day or two or three.  Make you miss school and work.  And for too many people end up sending them to the hospital, to the intensive care unit and tragically some people may die from it.  In fact, this year already, we have seen quite a few children who have died from flu.  So, although it is not a disease that will send lots of people who get it to the hospital, it can be very serious and even for those for whom it's an average case, it's no picnic.  You would rather avoid it for yourself and your kids.  The best way to do that is with vaccine. 

The second concern is that the vaccine may not be safe.  Corners may be cut.  Short cuts may have taken.  It's a new or different vaccine.  In fact, none of that is the case.  The vaccine is made in the same way it's made each year.  Each year, we look at the strains that are circulating and we look at the ones that likely to be in the population.  We put those into the flu vaccine.  That's exactly what has been done in this case.  Specifically against H1N1 influenza.  Made in the same production facilities with the same companies with the same methods.  As it is made each year.  Hundreds of millions of doses have been given.  My children will get it.  Other public health and societal leaders and experts will get it.  It's something that we have a high degree of confidence in. 

Third concern, it is too late for the vaccine, well, it's too soon to say it's too late.  We don't know what the rest of the season will bring.  Even in places where flu has been widespread.  It's affected 5% to 10%.  That leads 90% to 95% of the population that's still susceptible.  We can't predict what the future will hold and we know that vaccination is our best tool to reduce the impact of flu.  Where we stand now, all states have placed orders.  More than 2 million doses have been ordered.  Nearly all of the doses that are available.  More doses are becoming available each day.  When the states learn that vaccines become available, they place an order, it orders it by the provider.  So, the states at each state level, they identify a certain number of people who will receive or facilities which will receive the vaccine and how many doses will receive.

The state allocates it out to different providers to receive vaccine.  The flu mist or the shots.  The shots can come in single dose vials or multiple dose vials.  All of that has to be factored in when ordering.  It's shipped from four different warehouses.  Temperature-controlled.  It stays at the same temperature until it gets to the place where it will be given.  If it's the shot, its together, about the same time as needles, syringes.

It's a very big and complex undertaking.  It will be different in different parts of the country.  Some parts of the country will do lots of school-located vaccination.  Some places won't do so much. Some places may be better prepared than others.  Our goal is to help as many places as possible to prepare as well as possible.  So they can start as soon as possible.  And with that, I'll stop and take questions.  We'll start with the room.  Any questions here? 

Reporter: Hello, I'm Rebecca from CBS Atlanta.  There's seem to be some confusion in the some of the states and local governments.  As to how to disperse the vaccine, given such a small amount in this initial distribution, have you been given guidance to how to distribute the vaccine? 

Thomas Frieden: These are early days for vaccination.  We have only a small number of doses available.  The injectable med vaccine will become available next week.  And, initially, for the flu mist, the groups that are best to vaccinate with that, are young, healthy people, like health care workers, as well as people who care for infants, as well as school children.  It's really up to the state to figure out what will work best.  There is not a prioritization within the priority groups.  All of those groups are priority.  When the shot's gone, we want the five key priority groups to be vaccinated.  Pregnant women, health care workers, people who care for infants under the age of 6 and school children and young adults up to the age of 24 years. 

Reporter: One of the questions we have gotten from some of our listeners at NPR. If there's a problem with the vaccine how long before you knew it and how long they would know it?

Thomas Frieden: There have been initial studies from the clinical trials that have shown, nothing to be particularly concerned about in the trials that have been public so far.  We look at that very carefully.  We have a number of different systems in place.  Using a variety of sources including health plans and others.

The vaccine problems that could occur, would likely occur at a very low rate.  1 per 100,000.  It would take some time to know there was a problem.  On the other hand, there's no reason to think there would be more problem with this vaccine than with the vaccine each year.  We expect that there will be concerns for problems.

For example, we know that many people, each week, develop health problems, either it's a miscarriage, or a heart attack, even tragically a sudden death, and that those problems will not be prevented by the flu vaccine.

Some people who get the flu vaccine will experience some bad outcome and we will look at each report to see if it's related and if, in the overall group, there's any sign of an increase rate of adverse events.  We'll share that information publicly.  We're committed to transparency.  We'll go to the phone for the first call. 

Operator: Thank you.  At this time if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1. 

Betsy McKay: My question was about distribution.  I wondered if states are learning each week how much they can order for the next week, or do they get an advanced notice of how much they'll be able to order.  Is advance ordering something you're able to let them do, given the production schedule? 

Thomas Friden: We have the anticipated schedule for the next few months.  Obviously, the further out it gets, less certainty we have.  At least for the next few weeks, we have a pretty high degree of certainty that the vaccine will be available as per what the manufacture has told us and we're hoping and advising states that they should be actively planning for vaccination programs and anticipating that that the vaccine will be available.  By substantial quantity by the middle of November. 

Mike Stobbe: Thank you. Mike Stobbe from the AP.  Doctor, can you give us an updated number about how many doses will be available this week?  Also, is demand outstripping supply.  Is supply outstripping demand at this point? 

Thomas Frieden: This week, as of yesterday, about 2.4 million doses were available for ordering. About 2.2 million of them had been drawn down or ordered by this week.  Each day, as more vaccine is clear, more vaccine becomes available for ordering, each Friday we'll provide the totals. Some which would have become available that Thursday or Friday.  We're trying to make sure that we cut as much time as possible off the cycles to get it out and available for providers to vaccinate. To do that, means a little bit of messiness on how it comes out.  If there's a minor problem with any of the vaccine in any of the warehouses, we don't have it available for ordering. We have to make sure it's safe and temperature-controlled.  Before it will be released to the states.  Some lack of certainty.

We have a high degree of confidence by middle October, we'll have substantial amounts of flu vaccine available.  Clearly at this point, only some vaccine and not everyone can receive that vaccine.  Demand is outstripping supply. We expect that fairly soon, supply may well outstrip demand.  The challenge will be to try to ensure the people who benefited the most have every opportunity to be vaccinated. On the phone? 

Operator: Our next question is from "Time" magazine.

Alice Park: A question about the supply issue.  Looking ahead, did the calculations that the CDC made as far as the ordering include the potential that more and more individual entities would mandate the vaccine for their health care workers.  In New York, mandated it for the entire state that right now, we're having problems with getting the seasonal vaccine in enough supply?  More entities demanding the vaccine, therefore a higher rate of compliance or demand for the vaccine than you have had in previous seasons? 

Thomas Frieden: We're very confident that there will be plenty of vaccine for everyone who wants to be vaccinated. It won't be available when everyone wants to be vaccinated.  Providers will receive it from directly from the manufacturer.  Information should be available to the public through the state health department, to find out the details of where it will be available. That's not ready quite yet. Because, there are not large quantity -- there is not a large quantity of vaccine available today.  Out there to be given H1N1.  Seasonal flu vaccine, some areas have had less.  They're well over 50 million doses distributed earlier.  We're particularly Prioritizing those key groups I spoke about earlier.  On the phone? 

Operator: Next is from CNN.  Your line is open.

Karen Denice: Thank you for taking my question, are you seeing any mutation in the virus at this point and are you concerned at some point, that the vaccine will not match the virus as we continue through the season and we get seasonal flu and H1N1 both out there? 

Thomas Frieden: Our biggest concern is that the virus could change, mutate to become more deadly.  We have seen nothing that would be the case.  So far, in fact, the virus has been quite stable genetically. It hasn't changed much at all. The part of the virus that determines whether or not it's very deadly is a different part of the virus that determines whether or not you're going to be protected by the vaccine.  That's good news.

Because, it means that the vaccine that we have now, which is very effective, very highly, tightly matched with the virus that's spreading is likely to protect you even if this virus were to become more deadly.  And the match is excellent right now of the more than 1,000 samples that have been looked at from around the world. The vaccine strain is right in the middle.

Of that genetic variability and the variability is very small. We expect there will be a high level of match and a high level of effectiveness for this particular vaccine against this particular virus.  Clearly the most concerning possibility is the pocket that it could mutate.  Right now, neither of those things have happened. On the phone?  Another from the phone? 

Operator: Robert Bazell from NBC News, your line is open.

Robert Bazell: The local state health departments have had the cancel seasonal vaccine influenza programs because of, they haven't gotten orders when they wanted to, and San Francisco and some other places have had to cancel novel vaccine programs that they had, because it becomes clear even though they placed an order, promised an order on a certain date, the vaccine ends up not coming. Can we expect that a lot in the weeks and months ahead.

Thomas Frieden: As we anticipated the first couple of weeks are going to be bumpy. There are problems identified or not identified with some of the initial shipments.  But, I think what we're seeing now, is the tap beginning to flow.  We're seeing substantial quantity of vaccine beginning to get out. In an average flu season, we get out about 25 million flu doses out.  By the middle of this month, we're going to have tens of millions of doses available. Although it won't be everywhere, it will be widely available in the next few weeks.  We'll be comfortable as the season goes on. From the room? 

Reporter: Thank you. What would you say to people who are not in the priority group who are very eager and might become frustrated if they don't get vaccine soon, what your advice be for them? 

Thomas Frieden: People who are healthy, age 25 to 49 who can get flu mist.  Not one of the priority groups. There's vaccine available. It will be a while before vaccine is widely available.  We wished it was available for everyone now. Technology doesn't enable that to happen. Perhaps in a few years, we'll have new technologies which will allow that to happen.  That doesn't help us for this year.

Simple things that you can do to protect yourself against the flu, stay home if you're sick.  Very important. Cover your mouth when you cough and sneeze.  And wash your hands often.  Those three simple things can make a really big difference. On the phone? 

Operator: The next call is from the Associated Press.

Lauren Neergard: Kind of a technical question ensuring that children under 10 get their doses.  What advice are you giving to some of these providers to make sure they actually have enough on hand to give the kids a second dose, are you telling them to plan ahead and partial out that much and keep it on hand for the three-week return visit? 

Thomas Frieden: We anticipate that children age 9 and below will need two doses.  We don't have the final data on that.  We ask that places don't hold vaccine back.  More will be coming.  Vaccinate as many people as you can.  That second dose, given three to four weeks after the first dose, there will be plenty more to provide then.  On the phone? 

Jon Cohen: Hi, thanks.  You said you had an anticipated schedule, can you tell us what it is or make it public. You said that right now, supply isn't meeting demand.  Yet, that conflicted with requests for the 2.4 million doses, only being 2.2 million

Thomas Frieden: We can provide information and we will each Friday.  It's information that changes day-to-day as manufacturers figure out how much is ready for shipping and to clarify, vaccine goes from the manufacturers to a central distributor, and from the central distributor, onward to providers or the health departments to actually vaccinate.  I'm sorry, the second part of your question was about?

Supply and demand.  The 2.4 million available was the first 2.4 million doses.  Some states were figuring out exactly where they wanted to spend or send those doses.  So far nearly all of that 2.2 million has been called down.  It will take some time to get the whole system from the manufacturer through the distributor, to the providers and to people who want to get vaccinated up and running.  One of the things that this weekend and next, will provide a dry run.  Not enough vaccine around.  Although we wished we had more, some can get vaccinated.  It will get us ready to get a running start on vaccination mid to late October. 

Reporter: Thanks. 

Reporter: Doctor, you mentioned once or twice the possibility in such a situation that a problem was identified in the shipments, I guess at the production facility, has that happened yet?  Problems identified with swine flu vaccine.

Thomas Frieden: No vaccine has been found to problematic in any way.  Each time we do vaccination programs, we're meticulous at tracking and tracing each of the lots of vaccine.  That is particularly important not just to ensure that's safe, if there's a problem either with safety or with not work, to know that there was any point in the chain, the chain was compromised.  It's just a question of verifying that things are working well.  We haven't had any vaccine so far rejected because of any problem.  Two more questions.  On the phone. 

Todd Neal: I have a couple of nonvaccine questions.  I wonder how hospital and emergency departments are faring throughout this outbreak?  Also, is CDC making any recommendations about restricting visitation to patients suspected or confirmed H1N1. 

Thomas Frieden: With we have seen, are real stresses particularly on the emergency departments.  Largely from people who are coming in because they're very worried about influenza, may have influenza, probably don't need to be in a hospital emergency department.  On the other hand if you have an underlying health condition, if you're pregnant, it's very important when you have the flu to get treated promptly.

It's a complicated message and getting that understood and acted on effectively in communities throughout the U.S. is very challenging.  We see some stresses on emergency departments.  We have not so far seen problems with intensive care units with people who need respiratory support.  That's something that we're tracking closely.  That would be a great concern.

One of the things that hospitals can do to reduce the risk is to limit the number of visitors.  That's a balance between the emotional well being and the recovery of the patient.  We can provide general information for health care facilities about.  It's a facility by facility decision at this point.  One more question on the phone.

Robert Lowes: Yes, doctor, I have two questions, one is, there are recommendations to have patients who are, who have underlining conditions, any concern in your agency there may not be enough pneumonia.

Thomas Frieden: It's underused.  If you get the flu, it protects you against one of the more serious complications of the flu.  We haven't seen a shortage of pneumonia vaccine.  You had a second question. 

Robert Lowes: Yes, there's one poll which, by Harvard Public School of Health, that showed that only about 50% of American adults plan to get vaccinated and only about 40% were absolutely certain they were, are you going to do anything special to respond to that, I guess, lack of motivation to get vaccinated, any special or outreach plan? 

Thomas Frieden: There have been several different polls.  Most of them find that most people want to and plan to get vaccinated.  What will happen will depend on a lot of things.  How easy it is to get vaccinated.

And addressing the three concerns that I talked about earlier, understanding that flu isn't always mild, it can kill you, understanding that this vaccine is made in the same way that the seasonal flu vaccine is made, hundreds of millions of doses with an excellent safety record, and understanding even though the flu may be here in your community and may be decreasing in your community, it's a great idea to get vaccinated because you don't know what the rest of this long flu season is going to hold.

We haven't had a flu season like this in at least 50 years.  Unless there are any questions from the room, I think -- thank you very much for your interest.  It's a real challenge to balance for the public, information about the vaccine, information about the virus, understanding whether it's in the cases of emergency departments, they need to get care promptly on one hand if you're really sick or have an underlying health condition.

And similarly with vaccine, to ups that people do have concerns about safety and about whether it's necessary.  In fact, the flu vaccine is our best weapon against the flu.  We're fortunate to have the vaccine here.  Would have been great to have it earlier.  It's starting to become available.  Thank you very much. 
####
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Saturday, October 3, 2009

The Regressivity of Taxing Employer-Paid Health Insurance

The Regressivity of Taxing Employer-Paid Health Insurance

Posted using ShareThis