Judges reveal secrets to successful malpractice trials
PRACTICE ECONOMICS - MALPRACTICE
When it comes to the outcome of a medical malpractice jury
trial, a physician’s attitude, demeanor, and presentation make all the
difference, say judges who’ve presided over many such cases.
"The fact finder has to look at them and find them credible
and sincere when they’re hearing their story," said Lorenzo F. Garcia,
chief magistrate judge emeritus for the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Mexico.
"There’s truth and there’s perception, and perception can
trump the truth. In litigation, being right isn’t always good enough.
You can be right in a claim or right in a defense and still lose if the
fact finder doesn’t believe the testimony or dislikes a person, witness,
or an attorney."
Exhibiting arrogance or defensiveness when testifying can
quickly sway a jury against a defendant doctor, adds Judge Garcia, who
provided trial insight with several other judges at the American
Conference Institute’s obstetric malpractice claims forum.
When taking the stand, it helps to remain respectful at all
times, refrain from acting combative, and demonstrate concern when
discussing patients who were injured, he said.
Physicians should also be aware of how their attorneys are
presenting themselves and interacting with legal parties. Being rude to
judges, litigants, or attorneys can have a negative impact on jurors’
view of that particular side, said Sandra Mazer Moss, a retired
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas judge.
Doctors have a critical role in helping court participants
understand the medicine surrounding a case, notes Judge Mazer Moss, who
also spoke at the ACI conference. This includes properly preparing
attorneys to speak about medical events and ensuring jurors clearly
understand medical facts.
Health providers "can help explain procedures so that
attorneys can understand and relay the information," she noted. "When
you put a witness on the stand, they have to [clearly] explain how the
procedure was done. It would help if the doctor had physical aids,
PowerPoint [slides], or models."
However, Judge Garcia stresses that physicians and their
attorneys shouldn’t overly rely on technology during a trial. He has
presided over medical malpractice cases in which electronic equipment
failed and caused long delays, he said.
In some cases, the technology problems prevented plaintiffs or defendants from effectively presenting their arguments.
"To start a trial in such a fashion and see that jurors are
not happy and that time is going by; there’s a valuable lesson" there,
he said. "Make sure you practice and try the technology ahead of time. [Technology] can be exceedingly effective, or it can be a disaster if it
doesn’t work well."
Another contributor to a successful malpractice case is the
ability to tell a powerful story, Judge Garcia said. In his experience,
litigants who choose a central theme and weave that idea throughout the
trial are most effective.
For example, the defense may open the trial by emphasizing
that the case is about a patient’s bad luck, not bad medicine, and
coming back to that point throughout the proceedings.
"Quite frankly, that’s what jurors like to hear," he said.
"They want to hear a story, so part of the preparation is trying to find
the most important [piece] of the litigation and developing a story
that can be a recurring theme.
The development of a theme is one of the most significant
tasks parties can engage in, and it assists in the presentation of the
claim or the defense."
No comments:
Post a Comment